The convention on the rights of disabled persons: A remaining dilemma for New Zealand?
Sylvia Bell, Judy McGregor, Margaret Wilson
Abstract
Sylvia Bell, Judy McGregor, Margaret Wilson
Abstract
This article examines New Zealand's ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (the Disability Convention) and questions whether the assumption that New Zealand is treating its disabled people consistently with the requirements of the Convention is warranted. The authors conclude that New Zealand needs to reconsider aspects of the application of its domestic legislative framework before it can claim to be complying with the Convention.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article examines New Zealand's ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (the Disability Convention) and questions whether the assumption that New Zealand is treating its disabled people consistently with the requirements of the Convention is warranted. The authors conclude that New Zealand needs to reconsider aspects of the application of its domestic legislative framework before it can claim to be complying with the Convention.
Key concepts: Convention, Ratification, Project commissioning, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Dilemma, Legislature, Publishing, Law