2017NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro)Open access

The Effect Of Ground School Instruction On Participant Perception Of Climbing Self Efficacy

Nicholas Carmen Ferrell

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Rock climbing is a fast growing adventure sport that sees use in summer camps, university programs, and commercial recreation across the world. Because of its challenging nature, rock climbing is often perceived to be a scary experience for newcomers; but it also seems to have a huge potential for self-growth. In this study we examine if the type of ground school instruction provided to climbers before a climbing experience, as well as the type of climbing system used, has a significant effect on climber’s perceived self-efficacy. Climbing is a sport with many educational and recreational applications. To include as many people as possible in the lessons climbing has to offer, facilitators may benefit from using a setup that allows participants to be the most comfortable. In this study we applied two different ground school and climbing system methods to two separate groups of college students. Both groups were administered the same three-part survey to track changes in their self-efficacy score throughout the climbing experience. We found there to be a significant difference between the two groups, with the treatment group experiencing a higher change in efficacy.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rock climbing is a fast growing adventure sport that sees use in summer camps, university programs, and commercial recreation across the world. Because of its challenging nature, rock climbing is often perceived to be a scary experience for newcomers; but it also seems to have a huge potential for self-growth. In this study we examine if the type of ground school instruction provided to climbers before a climbing experience, as well as the type of climbing system used, has a significant effect on climber’s perceived self-efficacy. Climbing is a sport with many educational and recreational applications. To include as many people as possible in the lessons climbing has to offer, facilitators may benefit from using a setup that allows participants to be the most comfortable. In this study we applied two different ground school and climbing system methods to two separate groups of college students. Both groups were administered the same three-part survey to track changes in their self-efficacy score throughout the climbing experience. We found there to be a significant difference between the two groups, with the treatment group experiencing a higher change in efficacy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rock climbing is a fast growing adventure sport that sees use in summer camps, university programs, and commercial recreation across the world. Because of its challenging nature, rock climbing is often perceived to be a scary experience for newcomers; but it also seems to have a huge potential for self-growth. In this study we examine if the type of ground school instruction provided to climbers before a climbing experience, as well as the type of climbing system used, has a significant effect on climber’s perceived self-efficacy. Climbing is a sport with many educational and recreational applications. To include as many people as possible in the lessons climbing has to offer, facilitators may benefit from using a setup that allows participants to be the most comfortable. In this study we applied two different ground school and climbing system methods to two separate groups of college students. Both groups were administered the same three-part survey to track changes in their self-efficacy score throughout the climbing experience. We found there to be a significant difference between the two groups, with the treatment group experiencing a higher change in efficacy.

Key concepts: Climbing, Recreation, Adventure, Perception, Psychology, Mountaineering, Adventure education, Applied psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effect Of Ground School Instruction On Participant Perception Of Climbing Self Efficacy — Research Paper | ScholarLens