2014วิสัญญีสาร (Thai Journal of Anesthesiology)Requires access

Comparison of propofol and propofol/ thiopentone admixture for ProsealTM insertion

Pennapa Ariyapanich

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: The ProsealTM is commonly used for airway management during general anesthesia in Ratchaburi Hospital. Intravenous propofol (1%) has been used as an induction of choice for LMA insertion. However, the recommended dose of propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 given intravenously could be associated with cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Objectives: to assess insertion condition and hemodynamic responses by comparing propofol (1%) and an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1) during induction of anesthesia. Methods: In a prospective, randomized controlled study, 190 nonpremedicated patients undergoing elective surgery were allocated into two groups: Group P received propofol 1%. Group PT received an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1), both at a dose of 0.25 ml.kg-1. The insertion condition, ease of insertion, apnea time and hemodynamic responses between the two groups were assessed. Results: The incidences of resistance to mouth opening, resistance to insertion and coughing were significantly higher in the PT group than the P group (P = 0.017). There was no difference in terms of swallowing, movement and apnea time between the two groups. None of patients developed laryngospasm. Decrease in MAP and HR during administration of Propofol - thiopentone admixture was significantly less than administration of Propofol alone. Conclusions: In nonparalyzed patients, propofol provides better conditions and easier ProsealTM insertion, but has greater hemodynamic instability than an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The ProsealTM is commonly used for airway management during general anesthesia in Ratchaburi Hospital. Intravenous propofol (1%) has been used as an induction of choice for LMA insertion. However, the recommended dose of propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 given intravenously could be associated with cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Objectives: to assess insertion condition and hemodynamic responses by comparing propofol (1%) and an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1) during induction of anesthesia. Methods: In a prospective, randomized controlled study, 190 nonpremedicated patients undergoing elective surgery were allocated into two groups: Group P received propofol 1%. Group PT received an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1), both at a dose of 0.25 ml.kg-1. The insertion condition, ease of insertion, apnea time and hemodynamic responses between the two groups were assessed. Results: The incidences of resistance to mouth opening, resistance to insertion and coughing were significantly higher in the PT group than the P group (P = 0.017). There was no difference in terms of swallowing, movement and apnea time between the two groups. None of patients developed laryngospasm. Decrease in MAP and HR during administration of Propofol - thiopentone admixture was significantly less than administration of Propofol alone. Conclusions: In nonparalyzed patients, propofol provides better conditions and easier ProsealTM insertion, but has greater hemodynamic instability than an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The ProsealTM is commonly used for airway management during general anesthesia in Ratchaburi Hospital. Intravenous propofol (1%) has been used as an induction of choice for LMA insertion. However, the recommended dose of propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 given intravenously could be associated with cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Objectives: to assess insertion condition and hemodynamic responses by comparing propofol (1%) and an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1) during induction of anesthesia. Methods: In a prospective, randomized controlled study, 190 nonpremedicated patients undergoing elective surgery were allocated into two groups: Group P received propofol 1%. Group PT received an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1), both at a dose of 0.25 ml.kg-1. The insertion condition, ease of insertion, apnea time and hemodynamic responses between the two groups were assessed. Results: The incidences of resistance to mouth opening, resistance to insertion and coughing were significantly higher in the PT group than the P group (P = 0.017). There was no difference in terms of swallowing, movement and apnea time between the two groups. None of patients developed laryngospasm. Decrease in MAP and HR during administration of Propofol - thiopentone admixture was significantly less than administration of Propofol alone. Conclusions: In nonparalyzed patients, propofol provides better conditions and easier ProsealTM insertion, but has greater hemodynamic instability than an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1).

Key concepts: Propofol, Medicine, Anesthesia, Laryngospasm, Apnea, Hemodynamics, Swallowing, Airway

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of propofol and propofol/ thiopentone admixture for ProsealTM insertion — Research Paper | ScholarLens