Comparison of propofol and propofol/ thiopentone admixture for ProsealTM insertion
Pennapa Ariyapanich
Abstract
Pennapa Ariyapanich
Abstract
Background: The ProsealTM is commonly used for airway management during general anesthesia in Ratchaburi Hospital. Intravenous propofol (1%) has been used as an induction of choice for LMA insertion. However, the recommended dose of propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 given intravenously could be associated with cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Objectives: to assess insertion condition and hemodynamic responses by comparing propofol (1%) and an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1) during induction of anesthesia. Methods: In a prospective, randomized controlled study, 190 nonpremedicated patients undergoing elective surgery were allocated into two groups: Group P received propofol 1%. Group PT received an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1), both at a dose of 0.25 ml.kg-1. The insertion condition, ease of insertion, apnea time and hemodynamic responses between the two groups were assessed. Results: The incidences of resistance to mouth opening, resistance to insertion and coughing were significantly higher in the PT group than the P group (P = 0.017). There was no difference in terms of swallowing, movement and apnea time between the two groups. None of patients developed laryngospasm. Decrease in MAP and HR during administration of Propofol - thiopentone admixture was significantly less than administration of Propofol alone. Conclusions: In nonparalyzed patients, propofol provides better conditions and easier ProsealTM insertion, but has greater hemodynamic instability than an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background: The ProsealTM is commonly used for airway management during general anesthesia in Ratchaburi Hospital. Intravenous propofol (1%) has been used as an induction of choice for LMA insertion. However, the recommended dose of propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 given intravenously could be associated with cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Objectives: to assess insertion condition and hemodynamic responses by comparing propofol (1%) and an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1) during induction of anesthesia. Methods: In a prospective, randomized controlled study, 190 nonpremedicated patients undergoing elective surgery were allocated into two groups: Group P received propofol 1%. Group PT received an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1), both at a dose of 0.25 ml.kg-1. The insertion condition, ease of insertion, apnea time and hemodynamic responses between the two groups were assessed. Results: The incidences of resistance to mouth opening, resistance to insertion and coughing were significantly higher in the PT group than the P group (P = 0.017). There was no difference in terms of swallowing, movement and apnea time between the two groups. None of patients developed laryngospasm. Decrease in MAP and HR during administration of Propofol - thiopentone admixture was significantly less than administration of Propofol alone. Conclusions: In nonparalyzed patients, propofol provides better conditions and easier ProsealTM insertion, but has greater hemodynamic instability than an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1).
Key concepts: Propofol, Medicine, Anesthesia, Laryngospasm, Apnea, Hemodynamics, Swallowing, Airway