2004Unpublished venueRequires access

Population aging: It's not just the baby boom

Alicia H. Munnell

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The retirement of the baby boom — those people born between 1946 and 1964 — is almost upon us. The leading edge of this famous cohort turns 62 in 2008. With the aging of the baby boom, the population of the nation is about to gray rapidly over the next three decades. The purpose of this brief is to put the baby boom and its impact on population aging in perspective. Specifically, the baby boom is not the reason for the aging of the population; the aging is the result of long-term trends of increasing longevity and declining fertility. The bust-boombust pattern in fertility rates that resulted in the baby boom simply changes the path to an older society. Thus, the baby boom is not “a pig in a python,” a somewhat graphic metaphor frequently used to suggest that the large cohort is just passing through, and life will return to normal once the last member dies. Rather, the nation is facing a permanent change in its demographic profile.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The retirement of the baby boom — those people born between 1946 and 1964 — is almost upon us. The leading edge of this famous cohort turns 62 in 2008. With the aging of the baby boom, the population of the nation is about to gray rapidly over the next three decades. The purpose of this brief is to put the baby boom and its impact on population aging in perspective. Specifically, the baby boom is not the reason for the aging of the population; the aging is the result of long-term trends of increasing longevity and declining fertility. The bust-boombust pattern in fertility rates that resulted in the baby boom simply changes the path to an older society. Thus, the baby boom is not “a pig in a python,” a somewhat graphic metaphor frequently used to suggest that the large cohort is just passing through, and life will return to normal once the last member dies. Rather, the nation is facing a permanent change in its demographic profile.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The retirement of the baby boom — those people born between 1946 and 1964 — is almost upon us. The leading edge of this famous cohort turns 62 in 2008. With the aging of the baby boom, the population of the nation is about to gray rapidly over the next three decades. The purpose of this brief is to put the baby boom and its impact on population aging in perspective. Specifically, the baby boom is not the reason for the aging of the population; the aging is the result of long-term trends of increasing longevity and declining fertility. The bust-boombust pattern in fertility rates that resulted in the baby boom simply changes the path to an older society. Thus, the baby boom is not “a pig in a python,” a somewhat graphic metaphor frequently used to suggest that the large cohort is just passing through, and life will return to normal once the last member dies. Rather, the nation is facing a permanent change in its demographic profile.

Key concepts: Baby boom, Boom, Population, Bust, Fertility, Population ageing, Cohort, Demography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Population aging: It's not just the baby boom — Research Paper | ScholarLens