2009University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)Requires access

A Dialogical Logic-based Simulation Architecture for Social Agents and the Emergence of Extremist Behaviour

Piter Dykstra, Corinna Elsenbroich, Wander Jager, Gerard Renardel de Lavalette, Laurina Verbrugge, B. Edmonds, N. Gilbert

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract. In the flourishing research area of agent-based social sim-ulation, the focus is on the emergence of social phenomena from the interactions of individual autonomous agents. There is, however, a rela-tive underexposure of the cognitive properties of agents, as the existing agent architectures often focus on behaviour alone. Cognition becomes particularly salient when the subject under investigation concerns social phenomena where agents need to reason about other agents ’ beliefs. We see this as a requirement for any communication with some degree of intelligence. In this paper we use concepts and methods from dynamic epistemic logic to build agents capable of reasoning about other agents’ beliefs and their own. In dynamic epistemic logic, agents are assumed to be perfect rational reasoners. We break with this unrealistic assumption in order to bridge the gap between the sociological and the logical ap-proach. Our model is based on a minimal set of assumptions representing cognitive processes relevant to modelling the macro-phenomena of group formation and radicalisation. 1

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract. In the flourishing research area of agent-based social sim-ulation, the focus is on the emergence of social phenomena from the interactions of individual autonomous agents. There is, however, a rela-tive underexposure of the cognitive properties of agents, as the existing agent architectures often focus on behaviour alone. Cognition becomes particularly salient when the subject under investigation concerns social phenomena where agents need to reason about other agents ’ beliefs. We see this as a requirement for any communication with some degree of intelligence. In this paper we use concepts and methods from dynamic epistemic logic to build agents capable of reasoning about other agents’ beliefs and their own. In dynamic epistemic logic, agents are assumed to be perfect rational reasoners. We break with this unrealistic assumption in order to bridge the gap between the sociological and the logical ap-proach. Our model is based on a minimal set of assumptions representing cognitive processes relevant to modelling the macro-phenomena of group formation and radicalisation. 1

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract. In the flourishing research area of agent-based social sim-ulation, the focus is on the emergence of social phenomena from the interactions of individual autonomous agents. There is, however, a rela-tive underexposure of the cognitive properties of agents, as the existing agent architectures often focus on behaviour alone. Cognition becomes particularly salient when the subject under investigation concerns social phenomena where agents need to reason about other agents ’ beliefs. We see this as a requirement for any communication with some degree of intelligence. In this paper we use concepts and methods from dynamic epistemic logic to build agents capable of reasoning about other agents’ beliefs and their own. In dynamic epistemic logic, agents are assumed to be perfect rational reasoners. We break with this unrealistic assumption in order to bridge the gap between the sociological and the logical ap-proach. Our model is based on a minimal set of assumptions representing cognitive processes relevant to modelling the macro-phenomena of group formation and radicalisation. 1

Key concepts: Dialogical self, Bridge (graph theory), Focus (optics), Set (abstract data type), Cognition, Salient, Rational agent, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Dialogical Logic-based Simulation Architecture for Social Agents and the Emergence of Extremist Behaviour — Research Paper | ScholarLens