Multi-perspective User Preference Learning in a Chatting Domain
Wook-Hyun Shin, Yoonjae Jeong, Sung-Hyon Myaeng, Kyoung-Soo Han
Abstract
Wook-Hyun Shin, Yoonjae Jeong, Sung-Hyon Myaeng, Kyoung-Soo Han
Abstract
Learning user's preference is a key issue in intelligent system such as personalized service. The study on user preference model has adapted simple user preference model, which determines a set of preferred keywords or topic, and weights to each target. In this paper, we recommend multi-perspective user preference model that factors sentiment information in the model. Based on the topicality and sentimental information processed using natural language processing techniques, it learns a user's preference. To handle timc-variant nature of user preference, user preference is calculated by session, short-term and long term. User evaluation is used to validate the effect of user preference teaming and it shows 86.52%, 86.28%, 87.22% of accuracy for topic interest, keyword interest, and keyword favorableness.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Learning user's preference is a key issue in intelligent system such as personalized service. The study on user preference model has adapted simple user preference model, which determines a set of preferred keywords or topic, and weights to each target. In this paper, we recommend multi-perspective user preference model that factors sentiment information in the model. Based on the topicality and sentimental information processed using natural language processing techniques, it learns a user's preference. To handle timc-variant nature of user preference, user preference is calculated by session, short-term and long term. User evaluation is used to validate the effect of user preference teaming and it shows 86.52%, 86.28%, 87.22% of accuracy for topic interest, keyword interest, and keyword favorableness.
Key concepts: Preference, Computer science, Preference learning, Perspective (graphical), Set (abstract data type), Information retrieval, Human–computer interaction, Session (web analytics)