2016•Unpublished venueRequires access

Post-conflict land governance reform in the African Great Lakes region. Part III - Securing tenure of smallholder peasants.

van Maria Leeuwen, Doreen Nancy Kobusingye, P.H. Justin, R. Tchatchoua Djomo, van Jouke Dijk

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In post-conflict settings, securing tenure of local small-holders is considered of major importance to reduce and prevent local land disputes, to contribute to the recovery of rural livelihoods, and to improve agricultural production. Registration and other ways of formalizing land ownership are generally considered to significantly enhance local tenure security and rural development. Our research in Uganda, Burundi and South Sudan suggests, however, that post-conflict settings pose particular challenges to formalization of land ownership, which may for instance ignite conflict and competition, or add to confusion about local ownership and tenure security. A particular challenge is how to improve land tenure security of women, who experience specific vulnerabilities in accessing land, notably in post-conflict settings. Both customary and statutory tenure arrangements pose opportunities as well as threats to secure women’s access to land.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In post-conflict settings, securing tenure of local small-holders is considered of major importance to reduce and prevent local land disputes, to contribute to the recovery of rural livelihoods, and to improve agricultural production. Registration and other ways of formalizing land ownership are generally considered to significantly enhance local tenure security and rural development. Our research in Uganda, Burundi and South Sudan suggests, however, that post-conflict settings pose particular challenges to formalization of land ownership, which may for instance ignite conflict and competition, or add to confusion about local ownership and tenure security. A particular challenge is how to improve land tenure security of women, who experience specific vulnerabilities in accessing land, notably in post-conflict settings. Both customary and statutory tenure arrangements pose opportunities as well as threats to secure women’s access to land.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In post-conflict settings, securing tenure of local small-holders is considered of major importance to reduce and prevent local land disputes, to contribute to the recovery of rural livelihoods, and to improve agricultural production. Registration and other ways of formalizing land ownership are generally considered to significantly enhance local tenure security and rural development. Our research in Uganda, Burundi and South Sudan suggests, however, that post-conflict settings pose particular challenges to formalization of land ownership, which may for instance ignite conflict and competition, or add to confusion about local ownership and tenure security. A particular challenge is how to improve land tenure security of women, who experience specific vulnerabilities in accessing land, notably in post-conflict settings. Both customary and statutory tenure arrangements pose opportunities as well as threats to secure women’s access to land.

Key concepts: Land tenure, Security of tenure, Customary land, Livelihood, Corporate governance, Business, Statutory law, Competition (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Post-conflict land governance reform in the African Great Lakes region. Part III - Securing tenure of smallholder peasants. — Research Paper | ScholarLens