2016English in AfricaRequires access

Reimagining the “literary” in South African literary studies

Duncan Brown

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In a review article published in the Journal of Southern African Studies, entitled “Reimagining South African Literature” (2014), I argued that most of the attention to the probing question which Leon de Kock asked in 2005, “Does South African Literature Still Exist?,” has focused more on the qualifier “South African” than the noun “literature.” It remains a powerful question – deceptively simple, but concealing in its formulation several depth charges: questions of literary value; modes of reading; literary historiography; national/transnational identities; translation; readership; institutional location; and so on. In this article, I focus more on the notion of the “literary’ in literary studies in universities in South Africa (and elsewhere). It is to me perhaps the most challenging aspect of de Kock’s interrogative.Keywords: Literature, the literary, theory, criticism, canonicity

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a review article published in the Journal of Southern African Studies, entitled “Reimagining South African Literature” (2014), I argued that most of the attention to the probing question which Leon de Kock asked in 2005, “Does South African Literature Still Exist?,” has focused more on the qualifier “South African” than the noun “literature.” It remains a powerful question – deceptively simple, but concealing in its formulation several depth charges: questions of literary value; modes of reading; literary historiography; national/transnational identities; translation; readership; institutional location; and so on. In this article, I focus more on the notion of the “literary’ in literary studies in universities in South Africa (and elsewhere). It is to me perhaps the most challenging aspect of de Kock’s interrogative.Keywords: Literature, the literary, theory, criticism, canonicity

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a review article published in the Journal of Southern African Studies, entitled “Reimagining South African Literature” (2014), I argued that most of the attention to the probing question which Leon de Kock asked in 2005, “Does South African Literature Still Exist?,” has focused more on the qualifier “South African” than the noun “literature.” It remains a powerful question – deceptively simple, but concealing in its formulation several depth charges: questions of literary value; modes of reading; literary historiography; national/transnational identities; translation; readership; institutional location; and so on. In this article, I focus more on the notion of the “literary’ in literary studies in universities in South Africa (and elsewhere). It is to me perhaps the most challenging aspect of de Kock’s interrogative.Keywords: Literature, the literary, theory, criticism, canonicity

Key concepts: Literary criticism, Literary science, Literary theory, History of literature, Literature, History, Value (mathematics), Interrogative

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reimagining the “literary” in South African literary studies — Research Paper | ScholarLens