Reimagining the “literary” in South African literary studies
Duncan Brown
Abstract
Duncan Brown
Abstract
In a review article published in the Journal of Southern African Studies, entitled “Reimagining South African Literature” (2014), I argued that most of the attention to the probing question which Leon de Kock asked in 2005, “Does South African Literature Still Exist?,” has focused more on the qualifier “South African” than the noun “literature.” It remains a powerful question – deceptively simple, but concealing in its formulation several depth charges: questions of literary value; modes of reading; literary historiography; national/transnational identities; translation; readership; institutional location; and so on. In this article, I focus more on the notion of the “literary’ in literary studies in universities in South Africa (and elsewhere). It is to me perhaps the most challenging aspect of de Kock’s interrogative.Keywords: Literature, the literary, theory, criticism, canonicity
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In a review article published in the Journal of Southern African Studies, entitled “Reimagining South African Literature” (2014), I argued that most of the attention to the probing question which Leon de Kock asked in 2005, “Does South African Literature Still Exist?,” has focused more on the qualifier “South African” than the noun “literature.” It remains a powerful question – deceptively simple, but concealing in its formulation several depth charges: questions of literary value; modes of reading; literary historiography; national/transnational identities; translation; readership; institutional location; and so on. In this article, I focus more on the notion of the “literary’ in literary studies in universities in South Africa (and elsewhere). It is to me perhaps the most challenging aspect of de Kock’s interrogative.Keywords: Literature, the literary, theory, criticism, canonicity
Key concepts: Literary criticism, Literary science, Literary theory, History of literature, Literature, History, Value (mathematics), Interrogative