2011Unpublished venueRequires access

USE OF WATER TEST TO ASSESS THE SPERM MEMBRANE FUNCTIONAL INTEGRITY IN CRYOPRESERVED BULL SEMEN Uso de la prueba de agua para medir la integridad funcional de la membrana espermática en semen criopreservado de toros

Héctor Nava-Trujillo, Armando Quintero‐Moreno, Carla Osorio-Meléndezl, Jorge Rubio-Guillén, Freygelinne Carrillo-Fernández, Geovanny Finol-Parra

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The hypoosmotic swelling test (HOST) has been used to asses the sperm membrane functional integrity in bulls. However, for human, goat and dog semen, the water test (WT) has been proposed as a replacement to HOST, because WT uses disti­ lIed water and only five minutes of incubation. The aim of the present study was to compare the HOST and the WT to as­ sess the sperm membrane functional integrity of cryopreserved bull semen. The percentage of sperm with swelling tail was higher in WT (54.85 ± 13.63%, P<0.0001) than HOST (42.90 ± 12.89%), but both were correlated positively (r = 0.77, P<0.0001). In comparison with viability of thawed semen (52.52 ± 9.79%), only WT diminished significantly this parame­ ter to 45.95 ± 8.69%, P<0.0001. Acrosome integrity of thawed semen (82.35 ± 8.21 %) decreased significantly after HOST (57.87 ± 12.67%) and WT (39.00 ± 16.88%). Acrosome inte­ grity in thawed semen was correlated positively with results af­ ter HOST (r = 0.52; P = 0.0126) and WT (r = 0.52; P = 0.0115). In conclusion, the WT can assess the sperm membrane func­ tional integrity of cryopreserved bull semen and is able to re­ place the HOST.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The hypoosmotic swelling test (HOST) has been used to asses the sperm membrane functional integrity in bulls. However, for human, goat and dog semen, the water test (WT) has been proposed as a replacement to HOST, because WT uses disti­ lIed water and only five minutes of incubation. The aim of the present study was to compare the HOST and the WT to as­ sess the sperm membrane functional integrity of cryopreserved bull semen. The percentage of sperm with swelling tail was higher in WT (54.85 ± 13.63%, P<0.0001) than HOST (42.90 ± 12.89%), but both were correlated positively (r = 0.77, P<0.0001). In comparison with viability of thawed semen (52.52 ± 9.79%), only WT diminished significantly this parame­ ter to 45.95 ± 8.69%, P<0.0001. Acrosome integrity of thawed semen (82.35 ± 8.21 %) decreased significantly after HOST (57.87 ± 12.67%) and WT (39.00 ± 16.88%). Acrosome inte­ grity in thawed semen was correlated positively with results af­ ter HOST (r = 0.52; P = 0.0126) and WT (r = 0.52; P = 0.0115). In conclusion, the WT can assess the sperm membrane func­ tional integrity of cryopreserved bull semen and is able to re­ place the HOST.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The hypoosmotic swelling test (HOST) has been used to asses the sperm membrane functional integrity in bulls. However, for human, goat and dog semen, the water test (WT) has been proposed as a replacement to HOST, because WT uses disti­ lIed water and only five minutes of incubation. The aim of the present study was to compare the HOST and the WT to as­ sess the sperm membrane functional integrity of cryopreserved bull semen. The percentage of sperm with swelling tail was higher in WT (54.85 ± 13.63%, P<0.0001) than HOST (42.90 ± 12.89%), but both were correlated positively (r = 0.77, P<0.0001). In comparison with viability of thawed semen (52.52 ± 9.79%), only WT diminished significantly this parame­ ter to 45.95 ± 8.69%, P<0.0001. Acrosome integrity of thawed semen (82.35 ± 8.21 %) decreased significantly after HOST (57.87 ± 12.67%) and WT (39.00 ± 16.88%). Acrosome inte­ grity in thawed semen was correlated positively with results af­ ter HOST (r = 0.52; P = 0.0126) and WT (r = 0.52; P = 0.0115). In conclusion, the WT can assess the sperm membrane func­ tional integrity of cryopreserved bull semen and is able to re­ place the HOST.

Key concepts: Semen, Sperm, Andrology, Membrane integrity, Cryopreservation, Acrosome, Biology, Bull semen

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
USE OF WATER TEST TO ASSESS THE SPERM MEMBRANE FUNCTIONAL INTEGRITY IN CRYOPRESERVED BULL SEMEN Uso de la prueba de agua para medir la integridad funcional de la membrana espermática en semen criopreservado de toros — Research Paper | ScholarLens