2017American Journal of Educational ResearchOpen access

Do Larger Samples Really Lead to More Precise Estimates? A Simulation Study

Nestor Asiamah, Henry Kofi Mensah, Eric Fosu Oteng-Abayie

Open full text 34 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we use simulated data to find out if larger samples support estimation of population parameters by examining whether or not higher samples give rise to more precise estimates of population parameters. We simulated a normally distributed dataset and randomly drew 73 samples from it. Some basic statistics, namely the mean, standard deviation, standard error of the mean, confidence interval and the one-sample t-test significance were computed under some conditions for all samples. The correlation between sample size and each of these statistics was computed, among other statistical treatments. Our analysis suggests that larger samples produce estimates that better approximate the population parameters. The correlation between sample size and standard error of the mean is even stronger. We therefore conclude that larger samples lead to more precise estimates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, we use simulated data to find out if larger samples support estimation of population parameters by examining whether or not higher samples give rise to more precise estimates of population parameters. We simulated a normally distributed dataset and randomly drew 73 samples from it. Some basic statistics, namely the mean, standard deviation, standard error of the mean, confidence interval and the one-sample t-test significance were computed under some conditions for all samples. The correlation between sample size and each of these statistics was computed, among other statistical treatments. Our analysis suggests that larger samples produce estimates that better approximate the population parameters. The correlation between sample size and standard error of the mean is even stronger. We therefore conclude that larger samples lead to more precise estimates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, we use simulated data to find out if larger samples support estimation of population parameters by examining whether or not higher samples give rise to more precise estimates of population parameters. We simulated a normally distributed dataset and randomly drew 73 samples from it. Some basic statistics, namely the mean, standard deviation, standard error of the mean, confidence interval and the one-sample t-test significance were computed under some conditions for all samples. The correlation between sample size and each of these statistics was computed, among other statistical treatments. Our analysis suggests that larger samples produce estimates that better approximate the population parameters. The correlation between sample size and standard error of the mean is even stronger. We therefore conclude that larger samples lead to more precise estimates.

Key concepts: Statistics, Standard deviation, Confidence interval, Sample size determination, Standard error, Mathematics, Population mean, Sample (material)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Do Larger Samples Really Lead to More Precise Estimates? A Simulation Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens