Opening the Floodgates: The Roberts Court's Decision in Rapanos v. United States Spells Trouble for the Future of the Waters of the United States
B. R. Currie
Abstract
Open-access reader
B. R. Currie
Abstract
Open-access reader
Court and implications of Rapanos decision).For more than three decades, these [CWA] federal regulations on wetlands and streams had stood, through Republican and Democratic administrations and through GOP-and Democratic-controlled Congresses.Yet, with one extra vote, the Roberts court would have rewritten the scope of the Clean Water Act in its first termnot the act of a modest Supreme Court.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Court and implications of Rapanos decision).For more than three decades, these [CWA] federal regulations on wetlands and streams had stood, through Republican and Democratic administrations and through GOP-and Democratic-controlled Congresses.Yet, with one extra vote, the Roberts court would have rewritten the scope of the Clean Water Act in its first termnot the act of a modest Supreme Court.
Key concepts: Uniform Code of Military Justice, Law, Political science, Court decision, History of the United States, Certiorari, Original jurisdiction, Jurisdiction