2005SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The Reform of the European Control Merger Regulation in the Aftermath of the Airtours Case - The Eagerly Expected Debate: SLC v Dominance Test

Ioannis Kokkoris

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

The Commission in dealing with merger cases is bound to a teleological approach, taking into account the purpose and intent of the ECMR. This paper will focus on the current criteria used in assessing collective dominance as they have been formulated after the landmark decision of the CFI in the Airtours case. In addition, we will review the proposals to amend the ECMR that the European Commission recently published in the Green Paper and adopted in Council Regulation 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation -- “ECMR”). The reforms concern issues of jurisdiction, substance and procedure, and aim at simplifying and making the Commission's review of major European cross-border mergers speedier and more efficient. We will also analyse the Horizontal Merger Guidelines that were adopted as part of the reform package.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Commission in dealing with merger cases is bound to a teleological approach, taking into account the purpose and intent of the ECMR. This paper will focus on the current criteria used in assessing collective dominance as they have been formulated after the landmark decision of the CFI in the Airtours case. In addition, we will review the proposals to amend the ECMR that the European Commission recently published in the Green Paper and adopted in Council Regulation 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation -- “ECMR”). The reforms concern issues of jurisdiction, substance and procedure, and aim at simplifying and making the Commission's review of major European cross-border mergers speedier and more efficient. We will also analyse the Horizontal Merger Guidelines that were adopted as part of the reform package.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Commission in dealing with merger cases is bound to a teleological approach, taking into account the purpose and intent of the ECMR. This paper will focus on the current criteria used in assessing collective dominance as they have been formulated after the landmark decision of the CFI in the Airtours case. In addition, we will review the proposals to amend the ECMR that the European Commission recently published in the Green Paper and adopted in Council Regulation 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation -- “ECMR”). The reforms concern issues of jurisdiction, substance and procedure, and aim at simplifying and making the Commission's review of major European cross-border mergers speedier and more efficient. We will also analyse the Horizontal Merger Guidelines that were adopted as part of the reform package.

Key concepts: Merger control, Dominance (genetics), Jurisdiction, Commission, European commission, Political science, Control (management), Teleology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Reform of the European Control Merger Regulation in the Aftermath of the Airtours Case - The Eagerly Expected Debate: SLC v Dominance Test — Research Paper | ScholarLens