2000Unpublished venueRequires access

SUPPLEMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II

Rolf H. Eppinger, Emily Sun, Shashi M. Kuppa, Roger A. Saul

Open publisher page 166 citations

Abstract

In the SNPRM on advanced air bags, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposed a comprehensive set of injury criteria for evaluating the potential for injury to the head, neck, chest and lower extremities for the various dummy sizes, ranging from the 1-year-old child to the 50th percentile male. The comments received and the agency's responses are summarized in this paper and the various performance limits implemented in the final rule are shown in Table SES-1.In the SNPRM on advanced air bags, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposed a comprehensive set of injury criteria for evaluating the potential for injury to the head, neck, chest and lower extremities for the various dummy sizes, ranging from the 1-year-old child to the 50th percentile male. The comments received and the agency's responses are summarized in this paper and the various performance limits implemented in the final rule are shown in Table SES-1.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the SNPRM on advanced air bags, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposed a comprehensive set of injury criteria for evaluating the potential for injury to the head, neck, chest and lower extremities for the various dummy sizes, ranging from the 1-year-old child to the 50th percentile male. The comments received and the agency's responses are summarized in this paper and the various performance limits implemented in the final rule are shown in Table SES-1.In the SNPRM on advanced air bags, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposed a comprehensive set of injury criteria for evaluating the potential for injury to the head, neck, chest and lower extremities for the various dummy sizes, ranging from the 1-year-old child to the 50th percentile male. The comments received and the agency's responses are summarized in this paper and the various performance limits implemented in the final rule are shown in Table SES-1.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 166 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the SNPRM on advanced air bags, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposed a comprehensive set of injury criteria for evaluating the potential for injury to the head, neck, chest and lower extremities for the various dummy sizes, ranging from the 1-year-old child to the 50th percentile male. The comments received and the agency's responses are summarized in this paper and the various performance limits implemented in the final rule are shown in Table SES-1.In the SNPRM on advanced air bags, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposed a comprehensive set of injury criteria for evaluating the potential for injury to the head, neck, chest and lower extremities for the various dummy sizes, ranging from the 1-year-old child to the 50th percentile male. The comments received and the agency's responses are summarized in this paper and the various performance limits implemented in the final rule are shown in Table SES-1.

Key concepts: Percentile, Head injury, Ranging, Agency (philosophy), Medicine, Engineering, Aeronautics, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SUPPLEMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II — Research Paper | ScholarLens