Kylie Burns, Rachel Dioso‐Villa, Zoe Rathus
Abstract
Open-access reader
Judges apply law to facts. While this ‘umpire’ description of judicial decision-making is rhetorically (and often politically and publicly) attractive, it is of course a very incomplete account of ...
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Judges apply law to facts. While this ‘umpire’ description of judicial decision-making is rhetorically (and often politically and publicly) attractive, it is of course a very incomplete account of ...
Key concepts: Judicial opinion, Discretion, Law, Judicial discretion, Legal profession, Jurisprudence, Political science, Sociology