2016•Archives of NeuroscienceOpen access

On the Underestimation of Auditory Verbal Learning Impairments in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

John M. Hudson, Kenneth A. Flowers, Lauren E Morgan

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Background: The auditory verbal learning test (AVLT) procedure is routinely deployed in neuropsychological investigations to examine learning and memory status in research and clinical cohorts. Concerns however have been raised regarding the susceptibility of the standard AVLT procedure to ceiling effects, which may have adverse consequences for psychometric properties and result in an underestimation of true potential and differences between normal and abnormal scores. Methods: We examined the performance of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE; n = 40) who had completed a standard 15-item AVLT and compared a group of TLE patients (n = 12) with healthy controls (n = 12) who completed an extended 24-item AVLT, which was designed to minimise the probability of ceiling scores. Results: Ceiling effects on at least one trial (≥ 14) was achieved by 33% of patients on the 15-item test, with 60% of patients scoring within or above the average list learning total score. Increasing the list length to 24-items reduced the percentage of TLE patients scoring within the normal range to 42%. In addition, no patients but 25% of control participants achieved a maximum score on trial A5. The performance of controls was superior to patients for the best learning trial, learning rate and total learning score. Conclusions: Increasing the list length to 24-items eliminated ceiling scores in all TLE patients and most controls and allowed the true magnitude in difference between the groups to be observed. These findings have implications for decisions relating to optimal AVLT list lengths that might be deployed for memory assessment in TLE.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The auditory verbal learning test (AVLT) procedure is routinely deployed in neuropsychological investigations to examine learning and memory status in research and clinical cohorts. Concerns however have been raised regarding the susceptibility of the standard AVLT procedure to ceiling effects, which may have adverse consequences for psychometric properties and result in an underestimation of true potential and differences between normal and abnormal scores. Methods: We examined the performance of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE; n = 40) who had completed a standard 15-item AVLT and compared a group of TLE patients (n = 12) with healthy controls (n = 12) who completed an extended 24-item AVLT, which was designed to minimise the probability of ceiling scores. Results: Ceiling effects on at least one trial (≥ 14) was achieved by 33% of patients on the 15-item test, with 60% of patients scoring within or above the average list learning total score. Increasing the list length to 24-items reduced the percentage of TLE patients scoring within the normal range to 42%. In addition, no patients but 25% of control participants achieved a maximum score on trial A5. The performance of controls was superior to patients for the best learning trial, learning rate and total learning score. Conclusions: Increasing the list length to 24-items eliminated ceiling scores in all TLE patients and most controls and allowed the true magnitude in difference between the groups to be observed. These findings have implications for decisions relating to optimal AVLT list lengths that might be deployed for memory assessment in TLE.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The auditory verbal learning test (AVLT) procedure is routinely deployed in neuropsychological investigations to examine learning and memory status in research and clinical cohorts. Concerns however have been raised regarding the susceptibility of the standard AVLT procedure to ceiling effects, which may have adverse consequences for psychometric properties and result in an underestimation of true potential and differences between normal and abnormal scores. Methods: We examined the performance of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE; n = 40) who had completed a standard 15-item AVLT and compared a group of TLE patients (n = 12) with healthy controls (n = 12) who completed an extended 24-item AVLT, which was designed to minimise the probability of ceiling scores. Results: Ceiling effects on at least one trial (≥ 14) was achieved by 33% of patients on the 15-item test, with 60% of patients scoring within or above the average list learning total score. Increasing the list length to 24-items reduced the percentage of TLE patients scoring within the normal range to 42%. In addition, no patients but 25% of control participants achieved a maximum score on trial A5. The performance of controls was superior to patients for the best learning trial, learning rate and total learning score. Conclusions: Increasing the list length to 24-items eliminated ceiling scores in all TLE patients and most controls and allowed the true magnitude in difference between the groups to be observed. These findings have implications for decisions relating to optimal AVLT list lengths that might be deployed for memory assessment in TLE.

Key concepts: Verbal learning, Ceiling effect, Temporal lobe, Audiology, Verbal memory, Psychology, Epilepsy, Neuropsychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Underestimation of Auditory Verbal Learning Impairments in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy — Research Paper | ScholarLens