Antibody production in mice. VI. Effect of anti-carrier antibody on cellular co-operation in the primary anti-hapten antibody response.
Kiyoshi Takatsu, Takafumi Hamaoka, M. Kitagawa
Abstract
Kiyoshi Takatsu, Takafumi Hamaoka, M. Kitagawa
Abstract
We studied the effect of passively administered anti-carrier and anti-hapten antibodies on the primary anti-hapten antibody response to hapten—carrier conjugates in mice. Bacterial α-amylase (BαA), Taka-amylase A (TAA) and keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) were used as carrier molecules, and 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP) group was used as a haptenic determinant. Three groups of mice were injected intravenously with anti-carrier antiserum, anti-hapten antiserum and normal serum as the control, respectively, immediately after the immunization with the hapten—carrier conjugate. The primary anti-carrier antibody response was markedly suppressed by the passively administered anti-carrier antibody but not anti-hapten antibody. However, the primary anti-hapten antibody response was suppressed not only by passively administered anti-hapten antibody but also by the injection of anti-carrier antibody in an early period after the immunization. When anti-carrier antibody was given twice 0 and 7 days after immunization, the primary anti-hapten antibody response was markedly suppressed and the suppressive effect was observed even at a later period. In contrast, anti-hapten antibody given by the same schedule as above suppressed only the primary anti-hapten antibody response, but not the anti-carrier antibody response. Passively administered anti-carrier antibody did not suppress carrier-specific helper cell development, but still suppressed the development of B memory cells and antibody formation against carrier determinants. The antigen dose required for the development of B-cell memory was much higher than that necessary for the stimulation of T cells. Passively administered anti-carrier antibody clearly inhibited the cellular cooperation between carrier-committed helper cells and hapten-specific B cells and the augmented primary anti-hapten antibody response induced by carrier-primed T cells was clearly abolished. Furthermore, mice preimmunized with carrier showed significantly lower anti-hapten antibody response following the hapten—carrier challenge. Moreover, development of hapten-specific memory cells was also suppressed. Thus, even in the non-specific antibody-induced suppression by anti-carrier antibody, negative feedback effect of a B-cell product with anti-carrier specificity exclusively regulates the B-cell line development and differentiation.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We studied the effect of passively administered anti-carrier and anti-hapten antibodies on the primary anti-hapten antibody response to hapten—carrier conjugates in mice. Bacterial α-amylase (BαA), Taka-amylase A (TAA) and keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) were used as carrier molecules, and 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP) group was used as a haptenic determinant. Three groups of mice were injected intravenously with anti-carrier antiserum, anti-hapten antiserum and normal serum as the control, respectively, immediately after the immunization with the hapten—carrier conjugate. The primary anti-carrier antibody response was markedly suppressed by the passively administered anti-carrier antibody but not anti-hapten antibody. However, the primary anti-hapten antibody response was suppressed not only by passively administered anti-hapten antibody but also by the injection of anti-carrier antibody in an early period after the immunization. When anti-carrier antibody was given twice 0 and 7 days after immunization, the primary anti-hapten antibody response was markedly suppressed and the suppressive effect was observed even at a later period. In contrast, anti-hapten antibody given by the same schedule as above suppressed only the primary anti-hapten antibody response, but not the anti-carrier antibody response. Passively administered anti-carrier antibody did not suppress carrier-specific helper cell development, but still suppressed the development of B memory cells and antibody formation against carrier determinants. The antigen dose required for the development of B-cell memory was much higher than that necessary for the stimulation of T cells. Passively administered anti-carrier antibody clearly inhibited the cellular cooperation between carrier-committed helper cells and hapten-specific B cells and the augmented primary anti-hapten antibody response induced by carrier-primed T cells was clearly abolished. Furthermore, mice preimmunized with carrier showed significantly lower anti-hapten antibody response following the hapten—carrier challenge. Moreover, development of hapten-specific memory cells was also suppressed. Thus, even in the non-specific antibody-induced suppression by anti-carrier antibody, negative feedback effect of a B-cell product with anti-carrier specificity exclusively regulates the B-cell line development and differentiation.
Key concepts: Hapten, Antibody, Antiserum, Immunization, Antigen, Primary and secondary antibodies, Chemistry, Immunology