1994Marketing Education ReviewRequires access

The Teaching of Marketing Strategy

Fred Robins

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Marketing has long been thought of in terms of McCarthy’s 4P’s: that is, the “controllable” marketing decisions of product policy, pricing, distribution, and promotion. Strategic marketing management, in contrast, has not been similarly encapsulated. The foci of marketing strategy are those critically important “uncontrollables”: customers and competitors. The consequence is an imbalance in the perception of marketing among many business people and students of marketing in favor of more controllable, day to day “mix” management to the detriment of less controllable but equally important, competitor-related strategic marketing thinking. In the author’s view, this is undesirable given the needs of contemporary business and therefore should be rectified in marketing education. The author offers academic marketers a framework with which they can convey the essence of marketing strategy as memorably and therefore as effectively as the marketing mix.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Marketing has long been thought of in terms of McCarthy’s 4P’s: that is, the “controllable” marketing decisions of product policy, pricing, distribution, and promotion. Strategic marketing management, in contrast, has not been similarly encapsulated. The foci of marketing strategy are those critically important “uncontrollables”: customers and competitors. The consequence is an imbalance in the perception of marketing among many business people and students of marketing in favor of more controllable, day to day “mix” management to the detriment of less controllable but equally important, competitor-related strategic marketing thinking. In the author’s view, this is undesirable given the needs of contemporary business and therefore should be rectified in marketing education. The author offers academic marketers a framework with which they can convey the essence of marketing strategy as memorably and therefore as effectively as the marketing mix.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Marketing has long been thought of in terms of McCarthy’s 4P’s: that is, the “controllable” marketing decisions of product policy, pricing, distribution, and promotion. Strategic marketing management, in contrast, has not been similarly encapsulated. The foci of marketing strategy are those critically important “uncontrollables”: customers and competitors. The consequence is an imbalance in the perception of marketing among many business people and students of marketing in favor of more controllable, day to day “mix” management to the detriment of less controllable but equally important, competitor-related strategic marketing thinking. In the author’s view, this is undesirable given the needs of contemporary business and therefore should be rectified in marketing education. The author offers academic marketers a framework with which they can convey the essence of marketing strategy as memorably and therefore as effectively as the marketing mix.

Key concepts: Marketing, Marketing management, Marketing mix, Marketing strategy, Competitor analysis, Return on marketing investment, Marketing research, Marketing effectiveness

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Teaching of Marketing Strategy — Research Paper | ScholarLens