2016•Italian Journal of Animal ScienceOpen access

Effects of dam prepartum supplement level on performance and reproduction of heifer progeny

Lindsay M. Shoup, Frank A Ireland, Daniel W W Shike

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Objectives were to determine the effect of dam prepartum supplement level on growth performance, feed efficiency and reproductive performance of female progeny (127 heifers in year 1, 138 heifers in year 2). Mature, multiparous, fall-calving, Angus × Simmental cows (initial age = 5.6 ± 1.9 years, BW = 623 ± 70 kg, BCS = 5.7 ± 0.7) were used in a completely randomised design that included three supplement levels: no supplement (NS), low supplement, 2.16 kg·cow−1·d−1 (LS), or high supplement, 8.61 kg·cow−1·d−1 (HS). Cows grazed endophyte-infected tall fescue/red clover pastures and were bunk-fed supplement (70% dried distiller’s grains plus solubles [DDGS] and 30% soybean hulls) 103 ± 11 d prepartum to 2 ± 11 d postpartum. Dam prepartum supplementation did not affect (p ≥ .60) heifer progeny BW at weaning, breeding, nor at pregnancy verification. Dam prepartum supplementation did not affect (p ≥ .18) heifer progeny AI conception rate, overall pregnancy rate, nor calving rate. Calving date, calf birth BW, percentage of unassisted births, milk production and calf BW at 73 ± 16 d of age were not different (p ≥ .24) among heifer progeny, regardless of dam supplement level. In conclusion, these data suggest within a fall-calving, fescue-based production system, supplementing dams with 2.16 or 8.61 kg·cow−1·d−1 of a DDGS-based supplement does not affect growth performance and reproductive performance of subsequent female progeny.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives were to determine the effect of dam prepartum supplement level on growth performance, feed efficiency and reproductive performance of female progeny (127 heifers in year 1, 138 heifers in year 2). Mature, multiparous, fall-calving, Angus × Simmental cows (initial age = 5.6 ± 1.9 years, BW = 623 ± 70 kg, BCS = 5.7 ± 0.7) were used in a completely randomised design that included three supplement levels: no supplement (NS), low supplement, 2.16 kg·cow−1·d−1 (LS), or high supplement, 8.61 kg·cow−1·d−1 (HS). Cows grazed endophyte-infected tall fescue/red clover pastures and were bunk-fed supplement (70% dried distiller’s grains plus solubles [DDGS] and 30% soybean hulls) 103 ± 11 d prepartum to 2 ± 11 d postpartum. Dam prepartum supplementation did not affect (p ≥ .60) heifer progeny BW at weaning, breeding, nor at pregnancy verification. Dam prepartum supplementation did not affect (p ≥ .18) heifer progeny AI conception rate, overall pregnancy rate, nor calving rate. Calving date, calf birth BW, percentage of unassisted births, milk production and calf BW at 73 ± 16 d of age were not different (p ≥ .24) among heifer progeny, regardless of dam supplement level. In conclusion, these data suggest within a fall-calving, fescue-based production system, supplementing dams with 2.16 or 8.61 kg·cow−1·d−1 of a DDGS-based supplement does not affect growth performance and reproductive performance of subsequent female progeny.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives were to determine the effect of dam prepartum supplement level on growth performance, feed efficiency and reproductive performance of female progeny (127 heifers in year 1, 138 heifers in year 2). Mature, multiparous, fall-calving, Angus × Simmental cows (initial age = 5.6 ± 1.9 years, BW = 623 ± 70 kg, BCS = 5.7 ± 0.7) were used in a completely randomised design that included three supplement levels: no supplement (NS), low supplement, 2.16 kg·cow−1·d−1 (LS), or high supplement, 8.61 kg·cow−1·d−1 (HS). Cows grazed endophyte-infected tall fescue/red clover pastures and were bunk-fed supplement (70% dried distiller’s grains plus solubles [DDGS] and 30% soybean hulls) 103 ± 11 d prepartum to 2 ± 11 d postpartum. Dam prepartum supplementation did not affect (p ≥ .60) heifer progeny BW at weaning, breeding, nor at pregnancy verification. Dam prepartum supplementation did not affect (p ≥ .18) heifer progeny AI conception rate, overall pregnancy rate, nor calving rate. Calving date, calf birth BW, percentage of unassisted births, milk production and calf BW at 73 ± 16 d of age were not different (p ≥ .24) among heifer progeny, regardless of dam supplement level. In conclusion, these data suggest within a fall-calving, fescue-based production system, supplementing dams with 2.16 or 8.61 kg·cow−1·d−1 of a DDGS-based supplement does not affect growth performance and reproductive performance of subsequent female progeny.

Key concepts: Reproduction, Biology, Animal science, Zoology, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of dam prepartum supplement level on performance and reproduction of heifer progeny — Research Paper | ScholarLens