Evaluation of Platelet Indices for Differential Diagnosis of Thrombocytosis by ADVIA 120.
Young-Hee Song, Jeong Yeal Ahn, Soon Ho Park, Jung Eun Kim, Yiel Hea Seo, Pil Hwan Park, Kyung‐Hee Kim, Jae Hoon Lee
Abstract
Young-Hee Song, Jeong Yeal Ahn, Soon Ho Park, Jung Eun Kim, Yiel Hea Seo, Pil Hwan Park, Kyung‐Hee Kim, Jae Hoon Lee
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 4472 Background Because there is no single clinical or laboratory finding for the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET), a differential diagnosis of other myeloproliferative neoplasms or reactive thrombocytosis (RT) is always necessary. Developments in automated blood cell analysers can now measure various platelet indices and were used in this study to differentiate between ET and RT in patients with a platelet count of 600×103/μL or more. Method The subjects studied were 31 patients with ET and 224 patients with RT. The platelet counts, mean platelet volume (MPV), plateletcrit (PCT), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet mass (MPM), mean platelet component concentration (MPC) and large platelets (LPLT) were measured by ADVIA 120 (Bayer Diagnostics, USA) and the sensitivity and specificity of the two groups were determined. Results In essential thrombocythemia, all parameters except MPC were higher than those of reactive thrombocytosis and were statistically significant. The sensitivity and specificity were 74.2% and 84.4% when the platelet count was more than 820×103/μL. The sensitivity and specificity were 80.6% and 80.0% when the plateletcrit was more than 0.63%. The sensitivity and specificity were 64.5% and 99.1%, respectively, when LPLT was more than 23×103/μL. Conclusion The platelet counts and platelet indices are important for the differential diagnosis of thrombocytosis. The comparison of the plateletcrit and LPLT is particularly useful when the platelet count is markedly increased. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Abstract 4472 Background Because there is no single clinical or laboratory finding for the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET), a differential diagnosis of other myeloproliferative neoplasms or reactive thrombocytosis (RT) is always necessary. Developments in automated blood cell analysers can now measure various platelet indices and were used in this study to differentiate between ET and RT in patients with a platelet count of 600×103/μL or more. Method The subjects studied were 31 patients with ET and 224 patients with RT. The platelet counts, mean platelet volume (MPV), plateletcrit (PCT), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet mass (MPM), mean platelet component concentration (MPC) and large platelets (LPLT) were measured by ADVIA 120 (Bayer Diagnostics, USA) and the sensitivity and specificity of the two groups were determined. Results In essential thrombocythemia, all parameters except MPC were higher than those of reactive thrombocytosis and were statistically significant. The sensitivity and specificity were 74.2% and 84.4% when the platelet count was more than 820×103/μL. The sensitivity and specificity were 80.6% and 80.0% when the plateletcrit was more than 0.63%. The sensitivity and specificity were 64.5% and 99.1%, respectively, when LPLT was more than 23×103/μL. Conclusion The platelet counts and platelet indices are important for the differential diagnosis of thrombocytosis. The comparison of the plateletcrit and LPLT is particularly useful when the platelet count is markedly increased. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Key concepts: Thrombocytosis, Mean platelet volume, Platelet, Essential thrombocythemia, Medicine, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Differential diagnosis