2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Organizational Flexibility for Hypercompetitive Markets : Empirical Evidence of the Composition and Context Specificity of Dynamic Capabilities and Organization Design Parameters

N.P. van deWeerdt

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

textabstractThis research project, which builds on the conceptual work of Henk Volberda on the flexible firm, empirically investigates four aspects of organizational flexibility. Our analysis of data of over 1900 firms and over 3000 respondents shows (1) that several increasing levels of organizational flexibility can be distinguished, from operational to strategic flexibility, and these are formed by increasingly complex components of organizations. (2) Flexibility pays off particularly in unpredictable and dynamic markets. In less turbulent markets it pays not to invest in the highest order type of flexibility; operational flexibility will be more efficient, compared to strategic flexibility, in predictable markets. (3) The assumption that smaller firms by definition are better able to develop strategic flexibility than larger firms are, appears not to hold completely. Large firms are able to develop strategic flexibility as well, be it through different means. Once sufficiently flexible, large firms are better positioned to reap the benefits. The study further, and finally, shows (4) that firms can apply two different criteria to adjust the organization to the environment and create strategic fit: by adjusting to the requirements of their unique task environment or by adjusting to more generic institutional norms and best practices in the market. Both ‘ways of learning by organisations’ affect each other and will in business reality exist next to each other.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

textabstractThis research project, which builds on the conceptual work of Henk Volberda on the flexible firm, empirically investigates four aspects of organizational flexibility. Our analysis of data of over 1900 firms and over 3000 respondents shows (1) that several increasing levels of organizational flexibility can be distinguished, from operational to strategic flexibility, and these are formed by increasingly complex components of organizations. (2) Flexibility pays off particularly in unpredictable and dynamic markets. In less turbulent markets it pays not to invest in the highest order type of flexibility; operational flexibility will be more efficient, compared to strategic flexibility, in predictable markets. (3) The assumption that smaller firms by definition are better able to develop strategic flexibility than larger firms are, appears not to hold completely. Large firms are able to develop strategic flexibility as well, be it through different means. Once sufficiently flexible, large firms are better positioned to reap the benefits. The study further, and finally, shows (4) that firms can apply two different criteria to adjust the organization to the environment and create strategic fit: by adjusting to the requirements of their unique task environment or by adjusting to more generic institutional norms and best practices in the market. Both ‘ways of learning by organisations’ affect each other and will in business reality exist next to each other.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

textabstractThis research project, which builds on the conceptual work of Henk Volberda on the flexible firm, empirically investigates four aspects of organizational flexibility. Our analysis of data of over 1900 firms and over 3000 respondents shows (1) that several increasing levels of organizational flexibility can be distinguished, from operational to strategic flexibility, and these are formed by increasingly complex components of organizations. (2) Flexibility pays off particularly in unpredictable and dynamic markets. In less turbulent markets it pays not to invest in the highest order type of flexibility; operational flexibility will be more efficient, compared to strategic flexibility, in predictable markets. (3) The assumption that smaller firms by definition are better able to develop strategic flexibility than larger firms are, appears not to hold completely. Large firms are able to develop strategic flexibility as well, be it through different means. Once sufficiently flexible, large firms are better positioned to reap the benefits. The study further, and finally, shows (4) that firms can apply two different criteria to adjust the organization to the environment and create strategic fit: by adjusting to the requirements of their unique task environment or by adjusting to more generic institutional norms and best practices in the market. Both ‘ways of learning by organisations’ affect each other and will in business reality exist next to each other.

Key concepts: Flexibility (engineering), Context (archaeology), Industrial organization, Business, Work (physics), Order (exchange), Marketing, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Organizational Flexibility for Hypercompetitive Markets : Empirical Evidence of the Composition and Context Specificity of Dynamic Capabilities and Organization Design Parameters — Research Paper | ScholarLens