2015TNO RepositoryRequires access

The value of process safety culture for inspection in major hazard industies

G.I.J.M. Zwetsloot, R.A. Bezemer, V. Guldener

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Safety culture is increasingly recognised as the third important determinant of safety, complementary to technology and safety organisation. There are no legal requirements with respect to safety culture, except for nuclear power plants. Safety culture is and remains therefore a responsibility of the major hazards industry itself and it was recognised that safety cultures were relatively poorly developed. The purpose of this research was to assess safety culture in fourteen major hazard companies in four industrial sectors: refineries, (petro) chemical industry, bulk storage and chemical warehousing. This leads to safety culture scores, based on fourteen dimensions such as safety communication, contractor management and learning from incidents. (Petro) chemical companies and refineries had good or acceptable scores. If a score of 3 (a calculative safety culture) is regarded as the minimum acceptable score for a major hazard industry, several companies in bulk storage and chemical warehousing scored at or below the acceptable minimum. The process safety culture assessment also identified strengths and weaknesses regarding the fourteen dimensions of process safety culture, and these varied for the different industrial sectors. The outcomes enabled the inspectorate to focus on topics related to weak dimensions. Since the end of 2014 a new national project is being carried out to develop a simplified process safety culture assessment tool for inspectors. This modified method should reasonably correctly identify companies that have a ‘strong’ and a ‘weak’ safety culture. The aim is to nationally include safety culture in risk-based inspection strategies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Safety culture is increasingly recognised as the third important determinant of safety, complementary to technology and safety organisation. There are no legal requirements with respect to safety culture, except for nuclear power plants. Safety culture is and remains therefore a responsibility of the major hazards industry itself and it was recognised that safety cultures were relatively poorly developed. The purpose of this research was to assess safety culture in fourteen major hazard companies in four industrial sectors: refineries, (petro) chemical industry, bulk storage and chemical warehousing. This leads to safety culture scores, based on fourteen dimensions such as safety communication, contractor management and learning from incidents. (Petro) chemical companies and refineries had good or acceptable scores. If a score of 3 (a calculative safety culture) is regarded as the minimum acceptable score for a major hazard industry, several companies in bulk storage and chemical warehousing scored at or below the acceptable minimum. The process safety culture assessment also identified strengths and weaknesses regarding the fourteen dimensions of process safety culture, and these varied for the different industrial sectors. The outcomes enabled the inspectorate to focus on topics related to weak dimensions. Since the end of 2014 a new national project is being carried out to develop a simplified process safety culture assessment tool for inspectors. This modified method should reasonably correctly identify companies that have a ‘strong’ and a ‘weak’ safety culture. The aim is to nationally include safety culture in risk-based inspection strategies.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Safety culture is increasingly recognised as the third important determinant of safety, complementary to technology and safety organisation. There are no legal requirements with respect to safety culture, except for nuclear power plants. Safety culture is and remains therefore a responsibility of the major hazards industry itself and it was recognised that safety cultures were relatively poorly developed. The purpose of this research was to assess safety culture in fourteen major hazard companies in four industrial sectors: refineries, (petro) chemical industry, bulk storage and chemical warehousing. This leads to safety culture scores, based on fourteen dimensions such as safety communication, contractor management and learning from incidents. (Petro) chemical companies and refineries had good or acceptable scores. If a score of 3 (a calculative safety culture) is regarded as the minimum acceptable score for a major hazard industry, several companies in bulk storage and chemical warehousing scored at or below the acceptable minimum. The process safety culture assessment also identified strengths and weaknesses regarding the fourteen dimensions of process safety culture, and these varied for the different industrial sectors. The outcomes enabled the inspectorate to focus on topics related to weak dimensions. Since the end of 2014 a new national project is being carried out to develop a simplified process safety culture assessment tool for inspectors. This modified method should reasonably correctly identify companies that have a ‘strong’ and a ‘weak’ safety culture. The aim is to nationally include safety culture in risk-based inspection strategies.

Key concepts: Safety culture, Process safety, Process safety management, Hazard, Hazard analysis, Process (computing), Business, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The value of process safety culture for inspection in major hazard industies — Research Paper | ScholarLens