1942Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of Aileron Control Characteristics as Determined in Flight Tests of P-36, P-40, Spitfire, and Hurricane Pursuit Airplanes

William H. Phillips

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Army Air Force has made available several pursuit-type airplanes for quantitative investigation of their flying and handling qualities. One Item of special interest obtained from the results of the investigation is a comparison of the aileron control characteristics of the P-36, P-40, Hawker Hurricane, and Supermarine Spitfire airplanes. Figure 1 shows the design characteristics of the ailerons and the control sticks of the four airplanes. Aileron effectiveness may be expressed in terms of the helix angle generated by the wing tip in a steady roll. This angle is given by the expression pb/2V, where p is the rolling velocity, b the wing span, and V the true airspeed, expressed in consistent units. This quantity is convenient to use because, although it does not rep resent directly the rolling velocity of airplanes of different spans or airplanes operating at different speeds, it provides a satisfactory basis for computing the rate of roll and the time required to bank a given amount under any given set of conditions. The ratio of pb/2V obtained in any roll to the maximum value reached with full aileron deflection indicates the fraction of the maximum aileron travel that was reached. A complete discussion of this criterion for aileron effectiveness is given in reference 1. The aileron effectiveness of the various airplanes is compared in the following table on the basis of the response obtained with stick forces of 30 and 5 pounds. A force of 30 pounds is somewhat less than the greatest stick force exerted by the pilot. Repeated flight measurements have shown, however, that this force is a reasonable upper limit for maneuvering at high speeds.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Army Air Force has made available several pursuit-type airplanes for quantitative investigation of their flying and handling qualities. One Item of special interest obtained from the results of the investigation is a comparison of the aileron control characteristics of the P-36, P-40, Hawker Hurricane, and Supermarine Spitfire airplanes. Figure 1 shows the design characteristics of the ailerons and the control sticks of the four airplanes. Aileron effectiveness may be expressed in terms of the helix angle generated by the wing tip in a steady roll. This angle is given by the expression pb/2V, where p is the rolling velocity, b the wing span, and V the true airspeed, expressed in consistent units. This quantity is convenient to use because, although it does not rep resent directly the rolling velocity of airplanes of different spans or airplanes operating at different speeds, it provides a satisfactory basis for computing the rate of roll and the time required to bank a given amount under any given set of conditions. The ratio of pb/2V obtained in any roll to the maximum value reached with full aileron deflection indicates the fraction of the maximum aileron travel that was reached. A complete discussion of this criterion for aileron effectiveness is given in reference 1. The aileron effectiveness of the various airplanes is compared in the following table on the basis of the response obtained with stick forces of 30 and 5 pounds. A force of 30 pounds is somewhat less than the greatest stick force exerted by the pilot. Repeated flight measurements have shown, however, that this force is a reasonable upper limit for maneuvering at high speeds.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Army Air Force has made available several pursuit-type airplanes for quantitative investigation of their flying and handling qualities. One Item of special interest obtained from the results of the investigation is a comparison of the aileron control characteristics of the P-36, P-40, Hawker Hurricane, and Supermarine Spitfire airplanes. Figure 1 shows the design characteristics of the ailerons and the control sticks of the four airplanes. Aileron effectiveness may be expressed in terms of the helix angle generated by the wing tip in a steady roll. This angle is given by the expression pb/2V, where p is the rolling velocity, b the wing span, and V the true airspeed, expressed in consistent units. This quantity is convenient to use because, although it does not rep resent directly the rolling velocity of airplanes of different spans or airplanes operating at different speeds, it provides a satisfactory basis for computing the rate of roll and the time required to bank a given amount under any given set of conditions. The ratio of pb/2V obtained in any roll to the maximum value reached with full aileron deflection indicates the fraction of the maximum aileron travel that was reached. A complete discussion of this criterion for aileron effectiveness is given in reference 1. The aileron effectiveness of the various airplanes is compared in the following table on the basis of the response obtained with stick forces of 30 and 5 pounds. A force of 30 pounds is somewhat less than the greatest stick force exerted by the pilot. Repeated flight measurements have shown, however, that this force is a reasonable upper limit for maneuvering at high speeds.

Key concepts: Aileron, Deflection (physics), Wing, Engineering, Aeronautics, Structural engineering, Simulation, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Aileron Control Characteristics as Determined in Flight Tests of P-36, P-40, Spitfire, and Hurricane Pursuit Airplanes — Research Paper | ScholarLens