2016Clinical and Experimental Emergency MedicineOpen access

Comparison of internal jugular vein dilation between Valsalva maneuver and proximal internal jugular vein compression

Hyeonjoo Seong, Bora Kang, Giwoon Kim

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

Objective The Valsalva maneuver is recognized as an effective method to dilate the internal jugular vein (IJV).However, this maneuver cannot be performed in many cases, such as children and unconscious patients.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of proximal IJV compression, which can easily be performed, regardless of patient cooperation.Methods Healthy adult volunteers were recruited from tertiary hospital employees.Basic anatomic and physiologic data were collected.The subjects lay down as if they were undergoing IJV catheter insertion, in the supine position with their necks turned 30 degrees to the left.The main outcome was the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the distal IJV as measured by ultrasound in four stages.The first stage was sham without any maneuver.The second was Valsalva maneuver, the third was digital IJV compression, and the fourth was digital compression accompanied by simultaneous Valsalva maneuver.Results A total of 41 volunteers were enrolled.Twenty-six (63.41%) were male with an average age of 28.15 ±2.85 years.Mean height was 170.74±8.66cm and mean neck circumference was 35.28±3.87cm.The mean CSA-IJV was 1.06±0.36cm 2 without any maneuver.It increased to 1.34±0.45cm 2 with Valsalva maneuver (P<0.001), to 1.26±0.41cm 2 with digital compression (P<0.001), and to 1.41±0.47cm 2 with the two maneuvers combined (P=0.01). ConclusionDigital proximal IJV compression effectively dilates the distal IJV.When performed simultaneously with the Valsalva maneuver, the effect was enhanced.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective The Valsalva maneuver is recognized as an effective method to dilate the internal jugular vein (IJV).However, this maneuver cannot be performed in many cases, such as children and unconscious patients.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of proximal IJV compression, which can easily be performed, regardless of patient cooperation.Methods Healthy adult volunteers were recruited from tertiary hospital employees.Basic anatomic and physiologic data were collected.The subjects lay down as if they were undergoing IJV catheter insertion, in the supine position with their necks turned 30 degrees to the left.The main outcome was the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the distal IJV as measured by ultrasound in four stages.The first stage was sham without any maneuver.The second was Valsalva maneuver, the third was digital IJV compression, and the fourth was digital compression accompanied by simultaneous Valsalva maneuver.Results A total of 41 volunteers were enrolled.Twenty-six (63.41%) were male with an average age of 28.15 ±2.85 years.Mean height was 170.74±8.66cm and mean neck circumference was 35.28±3.87cm.The mean CSA-IJV was 1.06±0.36cm 2 without any maneuver.It increased to 1.34±0.45cm 2 with Valsalva maneuver (P<0.001), to 1.26±0.41cm 2 with digital compression (P<0.001), and to 1.41±0.47cm 2 with the two maneuvers combined (P=0.01). ConclusionDigital proximal IJV compression effectively dilates the distal IJV.When performed simultaneously with the Valsalva maneuver, the effect was enhanced.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective The Valsalva maneuver is recognized as an effective method to dilate the internal jugular vein (IJV).However, this maneuver cannot be performed in many cases, such as children and unconscious patients.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of proximal IJV compression, which can easily be performed, regardless of patient cooperation.Methods Healthy adult volunteers were recruited from tertiary hospital employees.Basic anatomic and physiologic data were collected.The subjects lay down as if they were undergoing IJV catheter insertion, in the supine position with their necks turned 30 degrees to the left.The main outcome was the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the distal IJV as measured by ultrasound in four stages.The first stage was sham without any maneuver.The second was Valsalva maneuver, the third was digital IJV compression, and the fourth was digital compression accompanied by simultaneous Valsalva maneuver.Results A total of 41 volunteers were enrolled.Twenty-six (63.41%) were male with an average age of 28.15 ±2.85 years.Mean height was 170.74±8.66cm and mean neck circumference was 35.28±3.87cm.The mean CSA-IJV was 1.06±0.36cm 2 without any maneuver.It increased to 1.34±0.45cm 2 with Valsalva maneuver (P<0.001), to 1.26±0.41cm 2 with digital compression (P<0.001), and to 1.41±0.47cm 2 with the two maneuvers combined (P=0.01). ConclusionDigital proximal IJV compression effectively dilates the distal IJV.When performed simultaneously with the Valsalva maneuver, the effect was enhanced.

Key concepts: Valsalva maneuver, Medicine, Internal jugular vein, Supine position, Compression (physics), Surgery, Radiology, Blood pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of internal jugular vein dilation between Valsalva maneuver and proximal internal jugular vein compression — Research Paper | ScholarLens