Post-common envelope PN, fundamental or irrelevant?
Orsola De Marco, Thomas Reichardt, Roberto Iaconi, T. C. Hillwig, George H. Jacoby, D. M. Keller, R. G. Izzard, Jason Nordhaus, Eric G. Blackman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Orsola De Marco, Thomas Reichardt, Roberto Iaconi, T. C. Hillwig, George H. Jacoby, D. M. Keller, R. G. Izzard, Jason Nordhaus, Eric G. Blackman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract One in 5 PN are ejected from common envelope binary interactions butKeplerresults are already showing this proportion to be larger. Their properties, such as abundances can be starkly different from those of the general population, so they should be considered separately when using PN as chemical or population probes. Unfortunately post-common envelope PN cannot be discerned using only their morphologies, but this will change once we couple our new common envelope simulations with PN formation models.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract One in 5 PN are ejected from common envelope binary interactions butKeplerresults are already showing this proportion to be larger. Their properties, such as abundances can be starkly different from those of the general population, so they should be considered separately when using PN as chemical or population probes. Unfortunately post-common envelope PN cannot be discerned using only their morphologies, but this will change once we couple our new common envelope simulations with PN formation models.
Key concepts: Common envelope, Envelope (radar), Kepler, Planetary nebula, Population, Physics, Astrophysics, Binary number