2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Get Real: A Perspective on Social Science

John Parker, Leonard Mars, Paul Ransome, Hilary Stanworth

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We begin our discussion of social science by quickly reviewing our argument so far. We have introduced, as necessary conceptual tools for social explanation, five basic concepts — individuals, nature, culture, action and social structure. We have shown that each has its own relatively autonomous causal power, so explanations must show how they interrelate in particular instances. Our examples have shown that the explanatory power of each concept varies between cases. All five are necessary, but even where a concept is on its most favourable ground, it is never sufficient to carry the whole weight of explanation. We have argued for the importance of these basic concepts by illustrating their strengths and weaknesses as they are put to work. In this chapter we have to shift gear, from demonstrating the usefulness of the concepts, to enlarge on the social theory which informs our choosing them for our tool kit and lies behind our claim that they are all fundamental for scientific, social explanations. This will involve returning to matters briefly considered in the Introduction and becoming a little more abstract, but we hope that what you have read so far will now enable you to follow our argument. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We begin our discussion of social science by quickly reviewing our argument so far. We have introduced, as necessary conceptual tools for social explanation, five basic concepts — individuals, nature, culture, action and social structure. We have shown that each has its own relatively autonomous causal power, so explanations must show how they interrelate in particular instances. Our examples have shown that the explanatory power of each concept varies between cases. All five are necessary, but even where a concept is on its most favourable ground, it is never sufficient to carry the whole weight of explanation. We have argued for the importance of these basic concepts by illustrating their strengths and weaknesses as they are put to work. In this chapter we have to shift gear, from demonstrating the usefulness of the concepts, to enlarge on the social theory which informs our choosing them for our tool kit and lies behind our claim that they are all fundamental for scientific, social explanations. This will involve returning to matters briefly considered in the Introduction and becoming a little more abstract, but we hope that what you have read so far will now enable you to follow our argument. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We begin our discussion of social science by quickly reviewing our argument so far. We have introduced, as necessary conceptual tools for social explanation, five basic concepts — individuals, nature, culture, action and social structure. We have shown that each has its own relatively autonomous causal power, so explanations must show how they interrelate in particular instances. Our examples have shown that the explanatory power of each concept varies between cases. All five are necessary, but even where a concept is on its most favourable ground, it is never sufficient to carry the whole weight of explanation. We have argued for the importance of these basic concepts by illustrating their strengths and weaknesses as they are put to work. In this chapter we have to shift gear, from demonstrating the usefulness of the concepts, to enlarge on the social theory which informs our choosing them for our tool kit and lies behind our claim that they are all fundamental for scientific, social explanations. This will involve returning to matters briefly considered in the Introduction and becoming a little more abstract, but we hope that what you have read so far will now enable you to follow our argument. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Argument (complex analysis), Epistemology, Perspective (graphical), Action (physics), Power (physics), Explanatory power, Strengths and weaknesses, Common ground

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Get Real: A Perspective on Social Science — Research Paper | ScholarLens