2016•Actual Problems of Russian LawOpen access

Ambiguity of Legislative Approaches to Criminal Evaluation of Intoxication

Е. К. Газданова

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This article analyzes federal laws on the basis of which intoxication is seen in the following criminal ways: aggravating circumstance (Part 1.1, Article 63 of the Criminal Code...); structural feature of a crime (Article 264.1 of the Criminal Code.); qualifying (qualifying special) sign of a crime (parts 2, 4, 6 Art. 264 of the Criminal Code). The adoption of these laws shows the ambiguity of the criminal evaluation of the state of intoxication by a legislator and questions the need for art. 23 of the Criminal Code, which, despite the innovations, reflected a neutral legislator's attitude towards the intoxication at the time of committing the crime.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article analyzes federal laws on the basis of which intoxication is seen in the following criminal ways: aggravating circumstance (Part 1.1, Article 63 of the Criminal Code...); structural feature of a crime (Article 264.1 of the Criminal Code.); qualifying (qualifying special) sign of a crime (parts 2, 4, 6 Art. 264 of the Criminal Code). The adoption of these laws shows the ambiguity of the criminal evaluation of the state of intoxication by a legislator and questions the need for art. 23 of the Criminal Code, which, despite the innovations, reflected a neutral legislator's attitude towards the intoxication at the time of committing the crime.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article analyzes federal laws on the basis of which intoxication is seen in the following criminal ways: aggravating circumstance (Part 1.1, Article 63 of the Criminal Code...); structural feature of a crime (Article 264.1 of the Criminal Code.); qualifying (qualifying special) sign of a crime (parts 2, 4, 6 Art. 264 of the Criminal Code). The adoption of these laws shows the ambiguity of the criminal evaluation of the state of intoxication by a legislator and questions the need for art. 23 of the Criminal Code, which, despite the innovations, reflected a neutral legislator's attitude towards the intoxication at the time of committing the crime.

Key concepts: Legislator, Criminal code, Ambiguity, Legislature, Criminal law, Sign (mathematics), Political science, Criminal procedure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ambiguity of Legislative Approaches to Criminal Evaluation of Intoxication — Research Paper | ScholarLens