1983Journal of Animal ScienceRequires access

Backfat and Loin Eye Area and Their Relationship to Performance of Boars Tested to Heavier Weights2

G. W. Jesse, Mark R. Ellersieck, A.L. Goetsch, Justin Gerke, R. K. Leavitt

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Data from four tests involving 360 boars (Duroc, Hampshire and Yorkshire) tested at the University of Missouri-Columbia Swine Test Station were analyzed to determine backfat (BF) and loin eye area (LEA) at weights of 104.3 and 131.5 kg. In addition, the relationship of BF and LEA to average daily gain (ADG) and feed efficiency (F/G) was examined and adjustments were determined for predicting BF and LEA at a standard weight. Average BF and LEA at 104.3 and 131.5 kg body weight were 1.94 cm and 36.7 cm2 and 2.61 cm and ‘42.0 cm2 , respectively. Backfat was noted to increase .024 cm/kg increase in body weight (34.5%) as weight increased from 104.3 to 131.5 kg (26.1%) whereas LEA increased 14.4% (.185 cm /kg). Differences in breed BF means were not significant (P>.05) at 104.3 and 131.5 kg. Correlations of BF and LEA at 104.3 kg with BF and LEA, respectively at 131.5 kg were low. Correlations of BF and LEA with ADG and F/G were low and erratic. The linear regression coefficient for BF (.024 cm/kg) on live weight was similar to the National Swine Inprovement Federation (NSIF) value; however, the coefficient for LEA (.185 cm2/kg) was smaller than the NSIF value.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Data from four tests involving 360 boars (Duroc, Hampshire and Yorkshire) tested at the University of Missouri-Columbia Swine Test Station were analyzed to determine backfat (BF) and loin eye area (LEA) at weights of 104.3 and 131.5 kg. In addition, the relationship of BF and LEA to average daily gain (ADG) and feed efficiency (F/G) was examined and adjustments were determined for predicting BF and LEA at a standard weight. Average BF and LEA at 104.3 and 131.5 kg body weight were 1.94 cm and 36.7 cm2 and 2.61 cm and ‘42.0 cm2 , respectively. Backfat was noted to increase .024 cm/kg increase in body weight (34.5%) as weight increased from 104.3 to 131.5 kg (26.1%) whereas LEA increased 14.4% (.185 cm /kg). Differences in breed BF means were not significant (P>.05) at 104.3 and 131.5 kg. Correlations of BF and LEA at 104.3 kg with BF and LEA, respectively at 131.5 kg were low. Correlations of BF and LEA with ADG and F/G were low and erratic. The linear regression coefficient for BF (.024 cm/kg) on live weight was similar to the National Swine Inprovement Federation (NSIF) value; however, the coefficient for LEA (.185 cm2/kg) was smaller than the NSIF value.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Data from four tests involving 360 boars (Duroc, Hampshire and Yorkshire) tested at the University of Missouri-Columbia Swine Test Station were analyzed to determine backfat (BF) and loin eye area (LEA) at weights of 104.3 and 131.5 kg. In addition, the relationship of BF and LEA to average daily gain (ADG) and feed efficiency (F/G) was examined and adjustments were determined for predicting BF and LEA at a standard weight. Average BF and LEA at 104.3 and 131.5 kg body weight were 1.94 cm and 36.7 cm2 and 2.61 cm and ‘42.0 cm2 , respectively. Backfat was noted to increase .024 cm/kg increase in body weight (34.5%) as weight increased from 104.3 to 131.5 kg (26.1%) whereas LEA increased 14.4% (.185 cm /kg). Differences in breed BF means were not significant (P>.05) at 104.3 and 131.5 kg. Correlations of BF and LEA at 104.3 kg with BF and LEA, respectively at 131.5 kg were low. Correlations of BF and LEA with ADG and F/G were low and erratic. The linear regression coefficient for BF (.024 cm/kg) on live weight was similar to the National Swine Inprovement Federation (NSIF) value; however, the coefficient for LEA (.185 cm2/kg) was smaller than the NSIF value.

Key concepts: Loin, Animal science, Breed, Body weight, Carcass weight, Linear regression, Coefficient of variation, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Backfat and Loin Eye Area and Their Relationship to Performance of Boars Tested to Heavier Weights2 — Research Paper | ScholarLens