Academic Freedom: Liberal Professors, their Critics and the Effect on Today's College Student
Bernadette McHugh
Abstract
Bernadette McHugh
Abstract
University of Colorado Professor Ward Churchill drew national attention in 2005 for an essay in which he described the victims of the 9/11 attacks as “little Eichmanns” (Johnson & Seelye, 2009), a reference to the passively complicit Nazi Adolf Eichmann. On April 2, 2009, a jury in Denver delivered a verdict that the University of Colorado had wrongfully dismissed Churchill for voicing these unpopular political views. Some viewed the verdict as a victory for free speech and academic freedom while others saw it as further proof that America’s universities had been corrupted by liberal professors who were intent on politicizing academia (Horowitz, 2006). The Churchill case has brought a long standing debate into the national spotlight during the 2008 presidential election season. Controversy arose on many campuses when some schools’ officials discouraged teachers from wearing political buttons around campus, barred them from attending political rallies, and told them not to affix political bumper stickers on their cars. The argument was that students need to be protected from a liberal professorate who are taking advantage of their youth and inexperience and indoctrinating them into a liberal mindset (Jaschik, 2008). There were also accusations that conservative students were discriminated against in class and in grading, and that universities were not making an effort to hire more conservative professors to promote equality of viewpoints.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
University of Colorado Professor Ward Churchill drew national attention in 2005 for an essay in which he described the victims of the 9/11 attacks as “little Eichmanns” (Johnson & Seelye, 2009), a reference to the passively complicit Nazi Adolf Eichmann. On April 2, 2009, a jury in Denver delivered a verdict that the University of Colorado had wrongfully dismissed Churchill for voicing these unpopular political views. Some viewed the verdict as a victory for free speech and academic freedom while others saw it as further proof that America’s universities had been corrupted by liberal professors who were intent on politicizing academia (Horowitz, 2006). The Churchill case has brought a long standing debate into the national spotlight during the 2008 presidential election season. Controversy arose on many campuses when some schools’ officials discouraged teachers from wearing political buttons around campus, barred them from attending political rallies, and told them not to affix political bumper stickers on their cars. The argument was that students need to be protected from a liberal professorate who are taking advantage of their youth and inexperience and indoctrinating them into a liberal mindset (Jaschik, 2008). There were also accusations that conservative students were discriminated against in class and in grading, and that universities were not making an effort to hire more conservative professors to promote equality of viewpoints.
Key concepts: Academic freedom, Politics, Verdict, Political science, Victory, Law, Presidential system, Sociology