Portuguese Translations of Thomas More's Utopia
Fátima Vieira
Abstract
Fátima Vieira
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article examines two inevitable questions when one is writing on Utopia and Portugal: the fact that Raphael Hythloday was identified as being Portuguese and the reception of Utopia in Portugal, no doubt influenced by the fact that the book was forbidden by the Inquisition. It then examines in full detail the six translations of Thomas More's work into European Portuguese, from Agostinho da Silva's partial translation in 1946 to Aires do Nascimento's critical translation in 2006, reflecting on the circumstances of the reception of these translations in the framework of the Portuguese dictatorship.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
ABSTRACT This article examines two inevitable questions when one is writing on Utopia and Portugal: the fact that Raphael Hythloday was identified as being Portuguese and the reception of Utopia in Portugal, no doubt influenced by the fact that the book was forbidden by the Inquisition. It then examines in full detail the six translations of Thomas More's work into European Portuguese, from Agostinho da Silva's partial translation in 1946 to Aires do Nascimento's critical translation in 2006, reflecting on the circumstances of the reception of these translations in the framework of the Portuguese dictatorship.
Key concepts: Utopia, Portuguese, Dictatorship, Literature, Work (physics), Philosophy, Art history, History