1981•Journal of Animal ScienceRequires access

Diet Quality and Performance of Cattle on Forest and Grassland Range

Jerry L. Holechek, Martin Vávra, Jon M. Skovlin

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

Cattle performance and diet quality on forest and grassland range in the Blue Mountains of eastern Oregon were evaluated over a 3-year period. Esophageally fistulated cows were used for the evaluation of diet quality. Pregnant yearling heifers were used for the evaluation of livestock performance. Data indicated that forest and grasslands offer diverse environments in terms of forage quality and beef cattle production. Forest diets contained more crude protein in early and late summer. In vitro organic matter digestibility of cattle diets was lower on the grasslands than on the forest pasture in early and late summer but was superior on the grasslands in the fall, provided that summer precipitation and fall regrowth occurred. Cattle gains were similar for both types in late spring, but greater for forest cattle in early and late summer. Cattle on grasslands gained more in the fall if precipitation occurred in late summer. Crude protein and digestible energy intake analyses revealed that digestible energy was the first-limiting nutrient. Grasslands may be most efficiently utilized in the spring, while use of forests between mid-July and mid-September should be advantageous because of higher quality forage. In years with late summer precipitation, cattle gains might be improved by returning cattle to the grasslands in mid-September. This type of grazing strategy has the potential to improve beef production over that obtained from the grazing of each type separately throughout the grazing season.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cattle performance and diet quality on forest and grassland range in the Blue Mountains of eastern Oregon were evaluated over a 3-year period. Esophageally fistulated cows were used for the evaluation of diet quality. Pregnant yearling heifers were used for the evaluation of livestock performance. Data indicated that forest and grasslands offer diverse environments in terms of forage quality and beef cattle production. Forest diets contained more crude protein in early and late summer. In vitro organic matter digestibility of cattle diets was lower on the grasslands than on the forest pasture in early and late summer but was superior on the grasslands in the fall, provided that summer precipitation and fall regrowth occurred. Cattle gains were similar for both types in late spring, but greater for forest cattle in early and late summer. Cattle on grasslands gained more in the fall if precipitation occurred in late summer. Crude protein and digestible energy intake analyses revealed that digestible energy was the first-limiting nutrient. Grasslands may be most efficiently utilized in the spring, while use of forests between mid-July and mid-September should be advantageous because of higher quality forage. In years with late summer precipitation, cattle gains might be improved by returning cattle to the grasslands in mid-September. This type of grazing strategy has the potential to improve beef production over that obtained from the grazing of each type separately throughout the grazing season.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cattle performance and diet quality on forest and grassland range in the Blue Mountains of eastern Oregon were evaluated over a 3-year period. Esophageally fistulated cows were used for the evaluation of diet quality. Pregnant yearling heifers were used for the evaluation of livestock performance. Data indicated that forest and grasslands offer diverse environments in terms of forage quality and beef cattle production. Forest diets contained more crude protein in early and late summer. In vitro organic matter digestibility of cattle diets was lower on the grasslands than on the forest pasture in early and late summer but was superior on the grasslands in the fall, provided that summer precipitation and fall regrowth occurred. Cattle gains were similar for both types in late spring, but greater for forest cattle in early and late summer. Cattle on grasslands gained more in the fall if precipitation occurred in late summer. Crude protein and digestible energy intake analyses revealed that digestible energy was the first-limiting nutrient. Grasslands may be most efficiently utilized in the spring, while use of forests between mid-July and mid-September should be advantageous because of higher quality forage. In years with late summer precipitation, cattle gains might be improved by returning cattle to the grasslands in mid-September. This type of grazing strategy has the potential to improve beef production over that obtained from the grazing of each type separately throughout the grazing season.

Key concepts: Grazing, Grassland, Pasture, Forage, Livestock, Agronomy, Environmental science, Nutrient

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diet Quality and Performance of Cattle on Forest and Grassland Range — Research Paper | ScholarLens