2009•University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)Open access

Herring v. United States: Extension of the Good-Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule in Fourth Amendment Cases

Anna C. Henning

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In Herring v. United States, a 2009 decision, the Supreme Court for the first time applied the good-faith exception to bar application of the exclusionary rule in a case involving police error regarding a warrant. This report discusses the Court's current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence and the legal implications.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Herring v. United States, a 2009 decision, the Supreme Court for the first time applied the good-faith exception to bar application of the exclusionary rule in a case involving police error regarding a warrant. This report discusses the Court's current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence and the legal implications.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Herring v. United States, a 2009 decision, the Supreme Court for the first time applied the good-faith exception to bar application of the exclusionary rule in a case involving police error regarding a warrant. This report discusses the Court's current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence and the legal implications.

Key concepts: Exclusionary rule, Warrant, Supreme court, Law, Jurisprudence, Political science, Search and seizure, Herring

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Herring v. United States: Extension of the Good-Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule in Fourth Amendment Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens