2016Annals of Plant Protection SciencesRequires access

Evaluation of newer insecticide molecules against pests of Tomato

S. A. Pawar, B.M. Wagh, R.V. Datkhile, MN Bhalekar

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The treatment with spinosad 45 SC @ 125 g a.i./ha was found to be the most effective and recorded least (1.31–3.07, 0.84–2.27 & 0.36–1.64) aphids, whiteflies and thrips/3 leaves/plant, respectively. However, the treatment with chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC was found highly effective against fruit borer of tomato recording 6.8% on number and 5.1% on weight basis fruit damage and higher yield (46.03 t/ha) with 1: 14.20 ICBR. However, it was found at par with spinosad 45 SC @ 125 g a.i./ha, flubendamide 39.35 SC @ 60 g a.i./ha and novaluron 10 EC @ 75 g a.i./ha with fruit damage in the range of 7.0 to 8.0% on number basis and 6.4 to 6.9% on weight basis, respectively. In overall bioefficacy against sucking pests as well as fruit borer, the treatment with spinosad was found most effective.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The treatment with spinosad 45 SC @ 125 g a.i./ha was found to be the most effective and recorded least (1.31–3.07, 0.84–2.27 & 0.36–1.64) aphids, whiteflies and thrips/3 leaves/plant, respectively. However, the treatment with chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC was found highly effective against fruit borer of tomato recording 6.8% on number and 5.1% on weight basis fruit damage and higher yield (46.03 t/ha) with 1: 14.20 ICBR. However, it was found at par with spinosad 45 SC @ 125 g a.i./ha, flubendamide 39.35 SC @ 60 g a.i./ha and novaluron 10 EC @ 75 g a.i./ha with fruit damage in the range of 7.0 to 8.0% on number basis and 6.4 to 6.9% on weight basis, respectively. In overall bioefficacy against sucking pests as well as fruit borer, the treatment with spinosad was found most effective.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The treatment with spinosad 45 SC @ 125 g a.i./ha was found to be the most effective and recorded least (1.31–3.07, 0.84–2.27 & 0.36–1.64) aphids, whiteflies and thrips/3 leaves/plant, respectively. However, the treatment with chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC was found highly effective against fruit borer of tomato recording 6.8% on number and 5.1% on weight basis fruit damage and higher yield (46.03 t/ha) with 1: 14.20 ICBR. However, it was found at par with spinosad 45 SC @ 125 g a.i./ha, flubendamide 39.35 SC @ 60 g a.i./ha and novaluron 10 EC @ 75 g a.i./ha with fruit damage in the range of 7.0 to 8.0% on number basis and 6.4 to 6.9% on weight basis, respectively. In overall bioefficacy against sucking pests as well as fruit borer, the treatment with spinosad was found most effective.

Key concepts: Spinosad, Thrips, Toxicology, Horticulture, Novaluron, Biology, Yield (engineering), Pesticide

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of newer insecticide molecules against pests of Tomato — Research Paper | ScholarLens