ScholarLens Back to search
2010•American Journal of Legal HistoryRequires access

We Dissent: Talking Back to the Rehnquist Court—Eight Cases That Subverted Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Steven K. Berenson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Steve Berenson; We Dissent: Talking Back to the Rehnquist Court—Eight Cases That Subverted Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, American Journal of Legal History,

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Steve Berenson; We Dissent: Talking Back to the Rehnquist Court—Eight Cases That Subverted Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, American Journal of Legal History,

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Steve Berenson; We Dissent: Talking Back to the Rehnquist Court—Eight Cases That Subverted Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, American Journal of Legal History,

Key concepts: Dissent, Civil liberties, Law, Civil rights, Political science, Sociology, Politics

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
We Dissent: Talking Back to the Rehnquist Court—Eight Cases That Subverted Civil Liberties and Civil Rights — Research Paper | ScholarLens