2016•Kardiologia PolskaOpen access

The effect of atrial pacing site on electrophysiological properties of the atrioventricular junction and induction of atrioventricular nodal reentry in patients with typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Radosław Kiedrowicz, Jarosław Kaźmierczak, Maciej Wielusiński

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies in humans have shown the site of atrial stimulation to influence atrioventricular (AV) conduction times and refractory periods, the demonstration of dual AV nodal (AVN) pathways, and induction of AVN reentry. These studies often found conflicting results. Moreover, among enrolled patients a minority of them were found to have AVN reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of right and left atrial pacing on the electrophysiological properties of the AV junction in the typical AVNRT population. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive patients with typical AVNRT were included. Atrial pacing was performed from the high right atrium (HRA) and the left atrium via the proximal coronary sinus (CS). RESULTS: Stimulation from either the HRA or the CS could result in dual AVN physiology and AVNRT. No site-dependent differences in the ease of induction of dual AVN pathways with variability of initiation from either site were found. However, AVNRT was easier to induce from the HRA. With CS pacing the leftward but not the rightward AVN approaches were the entry point to the AV node because of significantly shorter AH conduction times compared to HRA pacing. Conduction over the leftward AVN extensions could initiate the tachycardia with significantly shorter critical AH interval compared to conduction over the rightward AVN extensions; however, the AH interval during AVNRT and its cycle length were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Rightward and leftward AVN extensions are regular features of the AV node. Their different electrophysiological properties lead to variation in the demonstration of discontinuous AVN conduction and AVNRT during right and left atrial pacing. Despite the observation that the left AVN extensions could compose the entry point to the reentrant circuit, there is no evidence that they constitute the critical component of sustained typical AVNRT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies in humans have shown the site of atrial stimulation to influence atrioventricular (AV) conduction times and refractory periods, the demonstration of dual AV nodal (AVN) pathways, and induction of AVN reentry. These studies often found conflicting results. Moreover, among enrolled patients a minority of them were found to have AVN reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of right and left atrial pacing on the electrophysiological properties of the AV junction in the typical AVNRT population. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive patients with typical AVNRT were included. Atrial pacing was performed from the high right atrium (HRA) and the left atrium via the proximal coronary sinus (CS). RESULTS: Stimulation from either the HRA or the CS could result in dual AVN physiology and AVNRT. No site-dependent differences in the ease of induction of dual AVN pathways with variability of initiation from either site were found. However, AVNRT was easier to induce from the HRA. With CS pacing the leftward but not the rightward AVN approaches were the entry point to the AV node because of significantly shorter AH conduction times compared to HRA pacing. Conduction over the leftward AVN extensions could initiate the tachycardia with significantly shorter critical AH interval compared to conduction over the rightward AVN extensions; however, the AH interval during AVNRT and its cycle length were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Rightward and leftward AVN extensions are regular features of the AV node. Their different electrophysiological properties lead to variation in the demonstration of discontinuous AVN conduction and AVNRT during right and left atrial pacing. Despite the observation that the left AVN extensions could compose the entry point to the reentrant circuit, there is no evidence that they constitute the critical component of sustained typical AVNRT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies in humans have shown the site of atrial stimulation to influence atrioventricular (AV) conduction times and refractory periods, the demonstration of dual AV nodal (AVN) pathways, and induction of AVN reentry. These studies often found conflicting results. Moreover, among enrolled patients a minority of them were found to have AVN reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of right and left atrial pacing on the electrophysiological properties of the AV junction in the typical AVNRT population. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive patients with typical AVNRT were included. Atrial pacing was performed from the high right atrium (HRA) and the left atrium via the proximal coronary sinus (CS). RESULTS: Stimulation from either the HRA or the CS could result in dual AVN physiology and AVNRT. No site-dependent differences in the ease of induction of dual AVN pathways with variability of initiation from either site were found. However, AVNRT was easier to induce from the HRA. With CS pacing the leftward but not the rightward AVN approaches were the entry point to the AV node because of significantly shorter AH conduction times compared to HRA pacing. Conduction over the leftward AVN extensions could initiate the tachycardia with significantly shorter critical AH interval compared to conduction over the rightward AVN extensions; however, the AH interval during AVNRT and its cycle length were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Rightward and leftward AVN extensions are regular features of the AV node. Their different electrophysiological properties lead to variation in the demonstration of discontinuous AVN conduction and AVNRT during right and left atrial pacing. Despite the observation that the left AVN extensions could compose the entry point to the reentrant circuit, there is no evidence that they constitute the critical component of sustained typical AVNRT.

Key concepts: Medicine, Reentry, NODAL, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Atrioventricular node, Tachycardia, Electrophysiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effect of atrial pacing site on electrophysiological properties of the atrioventricular junction and induction of atrioventricular nodal reentry in patients with typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia — Research Paper | ScholarLens