1988•中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊Requires access

Syntactic Change in Chinese: On Grammaticalization

Alain Peyraube

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

The process of grammaticalization cannot furnish the causes of syntactic change; it does not explain why a reanalysis intervenes. However, it may tell us what are the mechanisms of the changes. This article presents four standard cases of grammaticalization of verbs into prepositions or particles; they concern (ⅰ) the disposal construction, (ⅱ) the comparative construction, (ⅲ) the dative construction and (ⅳ) the construction with a perfective aspectual particle. It is shown that in all these cases, grammaticalization of verbs into prepositions/particles intervenes in serial verb constructions of the type ”VI+NP1+V2 (+NP2)”, as it was assumed some fifteen years ago. Those who criticized this point of view, arguing that the verbs which were supposed to become prepositions were not employed in serial verb constuction, may not be right. The processes of grammaticalization studied in this paper are mechanisms of internal change which have created very frequently employed constructions. They can thus account for the appearance of new grammatical markers without necessitating the awkward explanation relying on the external borrowing from foreign languages, or that on the process of single lexical replacement, which may both have contributed to the appearance of new lexical items but probably have not much influenced grammatical system of the Chinese language.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The process of grammaticalization cannot furnish the causes of syntactic change; it does not explain why a reanalysis intervenes. However, it may tell us what are the mechanisms of the changes. This article presents four standard cases of grammaticalization of verbs into prepositions or particles; they concern (ⅰ) the disposal construction, (ⅱ) the comparative construction, (ⅲ) the dative construction and (ⅳ) the construction with a perfective aspectual particle. It is shown that in all these cases, grammaticalization of verbs into prepositions/particles intervenes in serial verb constructions of the type ”VI+NP1+V2 (+NP2)”, as it was assumed some fifteen years ago. Those who criticized this point of view, arguing that the verbs which were supposed to become prepositions were not employed in serial verb constuction, may not be right. The processes of grammaticalization studied in this paper are mechanisms of internal change which have created very frequently employed constructions. They can thus account for the appearance of new grammatical markers without necessitating the awkward explanation relying on the external borrowing from foreign languages, or that on the process of single lexical replacement, which may both have contributed to the appearance of new lexical items but probably have not much influenced grammatical system of the Chinese language.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The process of grammaticalization cannot furnish the causes of syntactic change; it does not explain why a reanalysis intervenes. However, it may tell us what are the mechanisms of the changes. This article presents four standard cases of grammaticalization of verbs into prepositions or particles; they concern (ⅰ) the disposal construction, (ⅱ) the comparative construction, (ⅲ) the dative construction and (ⅳ) the construction with a perfective aspectual particle. It is shown that in all these cases, grammaticalization of verbs into prepositions/particles intervenes in serial verb constructions of the type ”VI+NP1+V2 (+NP2)”, as it was assumed some fifteen years ago. Those who criticized this point of view, arguing that the verbs which were supposed to become prepositions were not employed in serial verb constuction, may not be right. The processes of grammaticalization studied in this paper are mechanisms of internal change which have created very frequently employed constructions. They can thus account for the appearance of new grammatical markers without necessitating the awkward explanation relying on the external borrowing from foreign languages, or that on the process of single lexical replacement, which may both have contributed to the appearance of new lexical items but probably have not much influenced grammatical system of the Chinese language.

Key concepts: Grammaticalization, Linguistics, Verb, Morpheme, Point (geometry), Modal verb, Lexical item, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Syntactic Change in Chinese: On Grammaticalization — Research Paper | ScholarLens