1974Journal of Animal ScienceRequires access

Influence of Degree of Fermentation on the Utilization of Energy from Alfalfa-Brome Forage

A. M. El Serafy, R. D. Goodrich, J. C. Meiske

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Studies were conducted with alfalfa-brome forage (alfalfa-brome, aerial part, early bloom, cut 2) harvested as hay (86.6% dry matter), haylage (50.8% dry matter) and silage (41.8% dry matter) to determine harvest and storage losses, performance of calves fed these feeds as their only energy source, net energy values and the efficiency of energy utilization for the three forage systems. Dry matter losses during harvesting were 25.4, 14.6 and 12.4% for hay, haylage and silage. Dry matter losses totaled 29.4, 22.1 and 21.3% and crude protein losses totaled 25.8, 27.6 and 21.2% during harvesting and storage for the respective feeds. Steer calves fed alfalfa-brome hay or haylage as their only source of dietary energy gained faster and consumed more dry matter than steers fed silage. Amounts of dry matter per 100 kg of gain were 1,099, 1,216 and 1,261 kg for steers fed hay, haylage and silage, respectively. Gain per hectare was not greatly influenced by method of harvesting and storage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Studies were conducted with alfalfa-brome forage (alfalfa-brome, aerial part, early bloom, cut 2) harvested as hay (86.6% dry matter), haylage (50.8% dry matter) and silage (41.8% dry matter) to determine harvest and storage losses, performance of calves fed these feeds as their only energy source, net energy values and the efficiency of energy utilization for the three forage systems. Dry matter losses during harvesting were 25.4, 14.6 and 12.4% for hay, haylage and silage. Dry matter losses totaled 29.4, 22.1 and 21.3% and crude protein losses totaled 25.8, 27.6 and 21.2% during harvesting and storage for the respective feeds. Steer calves fed alfalfa-brome hay or haylage as their only source of dietary energy gained faster and consumed more dry matter than steers fed silage. Amounts of dry matter per 100 kg of gain were 1,099, 1,216 and 1,261 kg for steers fed hay, haylage and silage, respectively. Gain per hectare was not greatly influenced by method of harvesting and storage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Studies were conducted with alfalfa-brome forage (alfalfa-brome, aerial part, early bloom, cut 2) harvested as hay (86.6% dry matter), haylage (50.8% dry matter) and silage (41.8% dry matter) to determine harvest and storage losses, performance of calves fed these feeds as their only energy source, net energy values and the efficiency of energy utilization for the three forage systems. Dry matter losses during harvesting were 25.4, 14.6 and 12.4% for hay, haylage and silage. Dry matter losses totaled 29.4, 22.1 and 21.3% and crude protein losses totaled 25.8, 27.6 and 21.2% during harvesting and storage for the respective feeds. Steer calves fed alfalfa-brome hay or haylage as their only source of dietary energy gained faster and consumed more dry matter than steers fed silage. Amounts of dry matter per 100 kg of gain were 1,099, 1,216 and 1,261 kg for steers fed hay, haylage and silage, respectively. Gain per hectare was not greatly influenced by method of harvesting and storage.

Key concepts: Dry matter, Silage, Forage, Hay, Hectare, Agronomy, Fodder, Alfalfa hay

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of Degree of Fermentation on the Utilization of Energy from Alfalfa-Brome Forage — Research Paper | ScholarLens