1942•Journal of Animal ScienceRequires access

Cross Breeding for Beef Production

Ralph Wesley Phillips, William H. Black, Bradford W. Knapp, R. T. Clark

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Data are presented on the first phase of an experiment designed to test the possibilities of maintaining heterosis in beef cattle with a system of criss-crossing, using Hereford cows as a foundation, and using Shorthorn, Angus, and Hereford bulls to sire successive generations of offspring. The present study is based on 57 crossbred steers from Hereford cows and sired by Shorthorn bulls. Sixty-seven Hereford steers served as controls. Analyses of these data show that: The crossbred calves gained more rapidly in the feed-lot than the purebreds and were heavier at time of marketing. These differences were highly significant. The differences found between the purebreds and crossbreds in efficiency of gain, slaughter grade, and carcass grade were not statistically significant. The dressing percentage was higher in the crossbred than in the purebred steers. The crossbreds had fewer digestive disorders in the feed-lot than the purebreds, In general, the crossbred steers were less variable than the purebred steers. These findings indicate that crossbreeding offers a means of increasing production per animal unit, and that it should be profitable, under conditions where the practice is compatible with other breeding and management practices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Data are presented on the first phase of an experiment designed to test the possibilities of maintaining heterosis in beef cattle with a system of criss-crossing, using Hereford cows as a foundation, and using Shorthorn, Angus, and Hereford bulls to sire successive generations of offspring. The present study is based on 57 crossbred steers from Hereford cows and sired by Shorthorn bulls. Sixty-seven Hereford steers served as controls. Analyses of these data show that: The crossbred calves gained more rapidly in the feed-lot than the purebreds and were heavier at time of marketing. These differences were highly significant. The differences found between the purebreds and crossbreds in efficiency of gain, slaughter grade, and carcass grade were not statistically significant. The dressing percentage was higher in the crossbred than in the purebred steers. The crossbreds had fewer digestive disorders in the feed-lot than the purebreds, In general, the crossbred steers were less variable than the purebred steers. These findings indicate that crossbreeding offers a means of increasing production per animal unit, and that it should be profitable, under conditions where the practice is compatible with other breeding and management practices.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Data are presented on the first phase of an experiment designed to test the possibilities of maintaining heterosis in beef cattle with a system of criss-crossing, using Hereford cows as a foundation, and using Shorthorn, Angus, and Hereford bulls to sire successive generations of offspring. The present study is based on 57 crossbred steers from Hereford cows and sired by Shorthorn bulls. Sixty-seven Hereford steers served as controls. Analyses of these data show that: The crossbred calves gained more rapidly in the feed-lot than the purebreds and were heavier at time of marketing. These differences were highly significant. The differences found between the purebreds and crossbreds in efficiency of gain, slaughter grade, and carcass grade were not statistically significant. The dressing percentage was higher in the crossbred than in the purebred steers. The crossbreds had fewer digestive disorders in the feed-lot than the purebreds, In general, the crossbred steers were less variable than the purebred steers. These findings indicate that crossbreeding offers a means of increasing production per animal unit, and that it should be profitable, under conditions where the practice is compatible with other breeding and management practices.

Key concepts: Purebred, Crossbreed, Shorthorn, Heterosis, Biology, Animal science, Sire, Beef cattle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cross Breeding for Beef Production — Research Paper | ScholarLens