2016•Socio-Economic ReviewRequires access

What is patient capital, and where does it exist?

Richard Deeg, Iain Hardie, Sylvia Maxfield

Open publisher page 51 citations

Abstract

This Special Issue was first motivated by what its co-editors see as a significant lacuna in comparative political economy (CPE): the absence of a modern comparative model of financial markets. CPE, to us, has remained largely stuck with a long-standing dichotomy between bank-based and financial-market-based systems, with the implications for varieties of capitalism with which readers of Socio-Economic Review are very familiar. The result, however, is relatively limited attention to financial markets and financial market actors. There is limited scope to consider the heterogeneity of financial market actors, national differences between financial markets, or processes of change within financial markets. This blind spot is all the more puzzling when set against the extensive study of financial markets across other academic disciplines, even if there is rarely a settled view of the attributes even of specific investor types (see Deeg and Hardie, this volume, for an overview in certain areas).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This Special Issue was first motivated by what its co-editors see as a significant lacuna in comparative political economy (CPE): the absence of a modern comparative model of financial markets. CPE, to us, has remained largely stuck with a long-standing dichotomy between bank-based and financial-market-based systems, with the implications for varieties of capitalism with which readers of Socio-Economic Review are very familiar. The result, however, is relatively limited attention to financial markets and financial market actors. There is limited scope to consider the heterogeneity of financial market actors, national differences between financial markets, or processes of change within financial markets. This blind spot is all the more puzzling when set against the extensive study of financial markets across other academic disciplines, even if there is rarely a settled view of the attributes even of specific investor types (see Deeg and Hardie, this volume, for an overview in certain areas).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This Special Issue was first motivated by what its co-editors see as a significant lacuna in comparative political economy (CPE): the absence of a modern comparative model of financial markets. CPE, to us, has remained largely stuck with a long-standing dichotomy between bank-based and financial-market-based systems, with the implications for varieties of capitalism with which readers of Socio-Economic Review are very familiar. The result, however, is relatively limited attention to financial markets and financial market actors. There is limited scope to consider the heterogeneity of financial market actors, national differences between financial markets, or processes of change within financial markets. This blind spot is all the more puzzling when set against the extensive study of financial markets across other academic disciplines, even if there is rarely a settled view of the attributes even of specific investor types (see Deeg and Hardie, this volume, for an overview in certain areas).

Key concepts: Financial market, Capitalism, Capital market, Indirect finance, Economics, Financial econometrics, Scope (computer science), Market data

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What is patient capital, and where does it exist? — Research Paper | ScholarLens