2016•Geodesy and GeodynamicsOpen access

Global spectral model of the geoid

Róbert Tenzer

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The coefficients of the Global Gravitational Models (GGMs) define the external gravitational field of the Earth. In many geoscience applications and gravity interpretations these coefficients are routinely used to represent the geoid surface and related gravitational field quantities without taking into consideration the internal convergence domain for computing the gravitational field inside the Earth's masses. In this study we discuss this issue and present the numerical approach for computing the gravitational field quantities on the geoid. The proposed numerical approach utilizes spectral expressions for the gravimetric forward modelling of topographic mass density distribution and the indirect gravimetric modelling of mass density heterogeneities inside the geoid. In the numerical realization we demonstrate that for precise applications the differences between the potential values computed at the topographic surface and on the geoid should be taken into consideration especially in mountainous regions with complex geology as well as in polar regions, where these differences in absolute values reach 40 m 2 s −2 (or more), which translates into vertical displacements between the geoid and the quasigeoid of about 4 m.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The coefficients of the Global Gravitational Models (GGMs) define the external gravitational field of the Earth. In many geoscience applications and gravity interpretations these coefficients are routinely used to represent the geoid surface and related gravitational field quantities without taking into consideration the internal convergence domain for computing the gravitational field inside the Earth's masses. In this study we discuss this issue and present the numerical approach for computing the gravitational field quantities on the geoid. The proposed numerical approach utilizes spectral expressions for the gravimetric forward modelling of topographic mass density distribution and the indirect gravimetric modelling of mass density heterogeneities inside the geoid. In the numerical realization we demonstrate that for precise applications the differences between the potential values computed at the topographic surface and on the geoid should be taken into consideration especially in mountainous regions with complex geology as well as in polar regions, where these differences in absolute values reach 40 m 2 s −2 (or more), which translates into vertical displacements between the geoid and the quasigeoid of about 4 m.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The coefficients of the Global Gravitational Models (GGMs) define the external gravitational field of the Earth. In many geoscience applications and gravity interpretations these coefficients are routinely used to represent the geoid surface and related gravitational field quantities without taking into consideration the internal convergence domain for computing the gravitational field inside the Earth's masses. In this study we discuss this issue and present the numerical approach for computing the gravitational field quantities on the geoid. The proposed numerical approach utilizes spectral expressions for the gravimetric forward modelling of topographic mass density distribution and the indirect gravimetric modelling of mass density heterogeneities inside the geoid. In the numerical realization we demonstrate that for precise applications the differences between the potential values computed at the topographic surface and on the geoid should be taken into consideration especially in mountainous regions with complex geology as well as in polar regions, where these differences in absolute values reach 40 m 2 s −2 (or more), which translates into vertical displacements between the geoid and the quasigeoid of about 4 m.

Key concepts: Geoid, Gravitational field, Geodesy, Undulation of the geoid, Geology, Geophysics, Ocean surface topography, Gravitation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Global spectral model of the geoid — Research Paper | ScholarLens