Morningstar v Commission : Raising the Threshold for Challenging Commission Commitments Decisions
Dieter Paemen, Victoria S. Baltrusch
Abstract
Dieter Paemen, Victoria S. Baltrusch
Abstract
The General Court upholds the European Commission (‘EC’) decision pursuant to Article 9 Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 making binding commitments offered by Thomson Reuters, and affirms the EC's wide discretion regarding the acceptance or rejection of commitments, provided the commitments address the competition concerns identified by the EC.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The General Court upholds the European Commission (‘EC’) decision pursuant to Article 9 Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 making binding commitments offered by Thomson Reuters, and affirms the EC's wide discretion regarding the acceptance or rejection of commitments, provided the commitments address the competition concerns identified by the EC.
Key concepts: Commission, Discretion, Raising (metalworking), European commission, Competition (biology), Law and economics, Business, Political science