Comparison of different metal oxide surge arrester models
Dino Lovrić, Slavko Vujević, Tonći Modrić
Abstract
Dino Lovrić, Slavko Vujević, Tonći Modrić
Abstract
Two methods for modeling metal oxide surge arresters are presented and compared: the IEEE Working Group 3.4.11 surge arrester model and the simplified surge arrester model proposed by Pinceti and Giannettoni. The comparison of model performances and accuracy is conducted in the program package EMTP – RV. Detailed instructions describing the implementation of the models into EMTP – RV are also provided.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Two methods for modeling metal oxide surge arresters are presented and compared: the IEEE Working Group 3.4.11 surge arrester model and the simplified surge arrester model proposed by Pinceti and Giannettoni. The comparison of model performances and accuracy is conducted in the program package EMTP – RV. Detailed instructions describing the implementation of the models into EMTP – RV are also provided.
Key concepts: Surge arrester, Emtp, Lightning arrester, Surge, Engineering, Reliability engineering, Electrical engineering, Electric power system