2016Sculpture JournalRequires access

The ideal of architecture as sculpted mass during the interwar period

David Frazer Lewis

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Interwar theories about sculpture, particularly ideas about direct carving and significant form, had more of an influence on architecture in Britain than has generally been acknowledged. Since buildings are produced by teams of craftsmen, the act of ‘sculpting’ becomes an imaginary one – a part of the design process. Giles Gilbert Scott liked to imagine carving buildings out of blocks of stone or a cliff face. It gave the design process mystical overtones, a meditation that guided the architect’s creation of significant form. Urged on by art critics with an interest in three-dimensional form, architects from Scott to Lutyens to T. H. Hughes came to see sculpting the wall plane as a key artistic duty. Driven by theories of formalism as well as mystical ideas about geometric order, they explored the same concepts as avant-garde sculptors. This article explores the ways in which some interwar architects conceived buildings as frankly sculptural objects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Interwar theories about sculpture, particularly ideas about direct carving and significant form, had more of an influence on architecture in Britain than has generally been acknowledged. Since buildings are produced by teams of craftsmen, the act of ‘sculpting’ becomes an imaginary one – a part of the design process. Giles Gilbert Scott liked to imagine carving buildings out of blocks of stone or a cliff face. It gave the design process mystical overtones, a meditation that guided the architect’s creation of significant form. Urged on by art critics with an interest in three-dimensional form, architects from Scott to Lutyens to T. H. Hughes came to see sculpting the wall plane as a key artistic duty. Driven by theories of formalism as well as mystical ideas about geometric order, they explored the same concepts as avant-garde sculptors. This article explores the ways in which some interwar architects conceived buildings as frankly sculptural objects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Interwar theories about sculpture, particularly ideas about direct carving and significant form, had more of an influence on architecture in Britain than has generally been acknowledged. Since buildings are produced by teams of craftsmen, the act of ‘sculpting’ becomes an imaginary one – a part of the design process. Giles Gilbert Scott liked to imagine carving buildings out of blocks of stone or a cliff face. It gave the design process mystical overtones, a meditation that guided the architect’s creation of significant form. Urged on by art critics with an interest in three-dimensional form, architects from Scott to Lutyens to T. H. Hughes came to see sculpting the wall plane as a key artistic duty. Driven by theories of formalism as well as mystical ideas about geometric order, they explored the same concepts as avant-garde sculptors. This article explores the ways in which some interwar architects conceived buildings as frankly sculptural objects.

Key concepts: Period (music), Architecture, Interwar period, Ideal (ethics), Art, Art history, Visual arts, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The ideal of architecture as sculpted mass during the interwar period — Research Paper | ScholarLens