1998Unpublished venueRequires access

Right Force for the Future: Who Pays the Bill.

Gary R. Addison

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : This research project expresses concerns of the ability for the US Army to continue involvement in smaller-scale contingencies operations and support Army After Next. Our current force structure is not designed to support our continued involvement in operations less than war around the world. Military leadership must design a force structure that meets these challenges. We cannot continue to subordinate operations less than war to the less likely scenario of a two-theater war. Logisticians must take the opportunity to lead the way into the next century and at the same time reduce requirements. A Revolution in Military Affairs is underway and a Revolution in Military Logistics will be critical to this program. It is time to redesign the logistics structure and doctrine to support the projected requirements on the US military. Our structure must be a highly mobile, agile force to support our power projection doctrine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : This research project expresses concerns of the ability for the US Army to continue involvement in smaller-scale contingencies operations and support Army After Next. Our current force structure is not designed to support our continued involvement in operations less than war around the world. Military leadership must design a force structure that meets these challenges. We cannot continue to subordinate operations less than war to the less likely scenario of a two-theater war. Logisticians must take the opportunity to lead the way into the next century and at the same time reduce requirements. A Revolution in Military Affairs is underway and a Revolution in Military Logistics will be critical to this program. It is time to redesign the logistics structure and doctrine to support the projected requirements on the US military. Our structure must be a highly mobile, agile force to support our power projection doctrine.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : This research project expresses concerns of the ability for the US Army to continue involvement in smaller-scale contingencies operations and support Army After Next. Our current force structure is not designed to support our continued involvement in operations less than war around the world. Military leadership must design a force structure that meets these challenges. We cannot continue to subordinate operations less than war to the less likely scenario of a two-theater war. Logisticians must take the opportunity to lead the way into the next century and at the same time reduce requirements. A Revolution in Military Affairs is underway and a Revolution in Military Logistics will be critical to this program. It is time to redesign the logistics structure and doctrine to support the projected requirements on the US military. Our structure must be a highly mobile, agile force to support our power projection doctrine.

Key concepts: Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Right Force for the Future: Who Pays the Bill. — Research Paper | ScholarLens