2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Lung function with aclidinium/formoterol fixed-dose combination: Pooled analysis of two phase III studies in COPD

Dave Singh, Anthony D’Urzo, James F. Donohue, Ferran Chuecos, Anne Leselbaum, Esther García Gil

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Combining two bronchodilators with different mechanisms of action may provide additional benefits versus monotherapy in patients with COPD. Aim: To assess the effect of twice-daily (BID) aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate fixed-dose combination (FDC) on bronchodilation in patients with moderate to severe COPD by pooling data from the ACLIFORM (NCT01462942) and AUGMENT (NCT01437397) trials in a pre-specified analysis. Method: Patients were randomised to aclidinium/formoterol FDC 400/12 or 400/6 µg, aclidinium 400 µg, formoterol 12 µg or placebo BID. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline in 1-hour morning post-dose FEV1 versus aclidinium and morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 versus formoterol at Week 24. Results: The intent-to-treat population included 3394 patients (mean age: 63.5 years; % predicted FEV1: 48.4). The FDCs produced significant improvements in the co-primary endpoints at the first time point assessed; these improvements were sustained at Week 24 (table). Bronchodilation was significant at the first time point post-dose (Day 1, 5 min post-dose: 108–120 mL vs placebo, p<0.001). Peak FEV1 was significantly improved with the FDCs versus placebo and both monotherapies at each visit (all p<0.001). Conclusion: Both doses of aclidinium/formoterol FDC demonstrated rapid, sustained improvements in lung function over 24 weeks versus placebo and the monotherapies in patients with COPD.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Combining two bronchodilators with different mechanisms of action may provide additional benefits versus monotherapy in patients with COPD. Aim: To assess the effect of twice-daily (BID) aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate fixed-dose combination (FDC) on bronchodilation in patients with moderate to severe COPD by pooling data from the ACLIFORM (NCT01462942) and AUGMENT (NCT01437397) trials in a pre-specified analysis. Method: Patients were randomised to aclidinium/formoterol FDC 400/12 or 400/6 µg, aclidinium 400 µg, formoterol 12 µg or placebo BID. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline in 1-hour morning post-dose FEV1 versus aclidinium and morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 versus formoterol at Week 24. Results: The intent-to-treat population included 3394 patients (mean age: 63.5 years; % predicted FEV1: 48.4). The FDCs produced significant improvements in the co-primary endpoints at the first time point assessed; these improvements were sustained at Week 24 (table). Bronchodilation was significant at the first time point post-dose (Day 1, 5 min post-dose: 108–120 mL vs placebo, p<0.001). Peak FEV1 was significantly improved with the FDCs versus placebo and both monotherapies at each visit (all p<0.001). Conclusion: Both doses of aclidinium/formoterol FDC demonstrated rapid, sustained improvements in lung function over 24 weeks versus placebo and the monotherapies in patients with COPD.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Combining two bronchodilators with different mechanisms of action may provide additional benefits versus monotherapy in patients with COPD. Aim: To assess the effect of twice-daily (BID) aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate fixed-dose combination (FDC) on bronchodilation in patients with moderate to severe COPD by pooling data from the ACLIFORM (NCT01462942) and AUGMENT (NCT01437397) trials in a pre-specified analysis. Method: Patients were randomised to aclidinium/formoterol FDC 400/12 or 400/6 µg, aclidinium 400 µg, formoterol 12 µg or placebo BID. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline in 1-hour morning post-dose FEV1 versus aclidinium and morning pre-dose (trough) FEV1 versus formoterol at Week 24. Results: The intent-to-treat population included 3394 patients (mean age: 63.5 years; % predicted FEV1: 48.4). The FDCs produced significant improvements in the co-primary endpoints at the first time point assessed; these improvements were sustained at Week 24 (table). Bronchodilation was significant at the first time point post-dose (Day 1, 5 min post-dose: 108–120 mL vs placebo, p<0.001). Peak FEV1 was significantly improved with the FDCs versus placebo and both monotherapies at each visit (all p<0.001). Conclusion: Both doses of aclidinium/formoterol FDC demonstrated rapid, sustained improvements in lung function over 24 weeks versus placebo and the monotherapies in patients with COPD.

Key concepts: Formoterol, Medicine, COPD, Placebo, Fixed-dose combination, Formoterol Fumarate, Clinical endpoint, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lung function with aclidinium/formoterol fixed-dose combination: Pooled analysis of two phase III studies in COPD — Research Paper | ScholarLens