2010•Unpublished venueRequires access

The EU's Role in Global Development: Still Calling the Tune in Africa?

Fredrik Söderbaum

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper focuses on the EU’s role and capacity to drive a policy for “global development” and sketch out collaborative agreements with other international organisations and third countries in this field. Particular emphasis is placed on the EU’s role in Africa. The main objective of the “European Consensus on Development” is said to be the eradication of poverty in the context of sustainable development, including the pursuit of the MDGs. The paper shows how intimately related the EU’s internal dimensions are with its capacity to act externally (actorness). Although many European politicians and policymakers frequently emphasise that the EU is the world’s biggest aid player, this can often be understood in terms of “presence” rather than a capacity to act. While, on the one hand, the EU plays a role in the international policy discussion in multilateral fora and on global development policy (e.g. Paris Agenda, MDG, budget support etc), on the other hand, the EU is not acting as one ‘on the ground’ in the developing countries. In fact, in contrast to its official policy the EU is not a unified actor in global development, at least when focus is placed on development cooperation in Africa. In practice the European Commission often acts as “the 28 th ” member state, conducting its own aid policies, rather than serving as the hub for donor coordination within the EU as a whole. The European Consensus is, as one donor official in an EU member state put it, “ice thin.” The fragmented administrative responsibility within the EU’s “foreign policy complex” is another factor that severely limits the EU’s actorness in this field.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper focuses on the EU’s role and capacity to drive a policy for “global development” and sketch out collaborative agreements with other international organisations and third countries in this field. Particular emphasis is placed on the EU’s role in Africa. The main objective of the “European Consensus on Development” is said to be the eradication of poverty in the context of sustainable development, including the pursuit of the MDGs. The paper shows how intimately related the EU’s internal dimensions are with its capacity to act externally (actorness). Although many European politicians and policymakers frequently emphasise that the EU is the world’s biggest aid player, this can often be understood in terms of “presence” rather than a capacity to act. While, on the one hand, the EU plays a role in the international policy discussion in multilateral fora and on global development policy (e.g. Paris Agenda, MDG, budget support etc), on the other hand, the EU is not acting as one ‘on the ground’ in the developing countries. In fact, in contrast to its official policy the EU is not a unified actor in global development, at least when focus is placed on development cooperation in Africa. In practice the European Commission often acts as “the 28 th ” member state, conducting its own aid policies, rather than serving as the hub for donor coordination within the EU as a whole. The European Consensus is, as one donor official in an EU member state put it, “ice thin.” The fragmented administrative responsibility within the EU’s “foreign policy complex” is another factor that severely limits the EU’s actorness in this field.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper focuses on the EU’s role and capacity to drive a policy for “global development” and sketch out collaborative agreements with other international organisations and third countries in this field. Particular emphasis is placed on the EU’s role in Africa. The main objective of the “European Consensus on Development” is said to be the eradication of poverty in the context of sustainable development, including the pursuit of the MDGs. The paper shows how intimately related the EU’s internal dimensions are with its capacity to act externally (actorness). Although many European politicians and policymakers frequently emphasise that the EU is the world’s biggest aid player, this can often be understood in terms of “presence” rather than a capacity to act. While, on the one hand, the EU plays a role in the international policy discussion in multilateral fora and on global development policy (e.g. Paris Agenda, MDG, budget support etc), on the other hand, the EU is not acting as one ‘on the ground’ in the developing countries. In fact, in contrast to its official policy the EU is not a unified actor in global development, at least when focus is placed on development cooperation in Africa. In practice the European Commission often acts as “the 28 th ” member state, conducting its own aid policies, rather than serving as the hub for donor coordination within the EU as a whole. The European Consensus is, as one donor official in an EU member state put it, “ice thin.” The fragmented administrative responsibility within the EU’s “foreign policy complex” is another factor that severely limits the EU’s actorness in this field.

Key concepts: Political science, Context (archaeology), Member state, European union, State (computer science), International development, Commission, International trade

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The EU's Role in Global Development: Still Calling the Tune in Africa? — Research Paper | ScholarLens