2012Unpublished venueRequires access

경도가 동일한 한천 및 젤라틴 젤의 이화학적 특성 비교

류지나, 정준호, 이수용, 고상훈

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this study, the physicochemical properties of gelatin and agar gels with similar hardness were compared in order to determine the potential of agar-based gelatin substitute. Gel was prepared by adding 60 g sugar to 150 mL distilled water and subsequently gelatin or agar was added. Gelatin and agar concentrations used were 12 and 2 g/mL, respectively, for uniform hardness. Gelatin and agar gels showed no significant hardness values which were 22.36 and 22.80, respectively. The pH values of gelatin and agar gels formed were 8.17 and 7.05, respectively. Agar gel (14.13oBx) was slightly higher in sugar content than gelatin gel (12.97oBx). The brightness of gelatin gel surface was brighter than that of agar gel surface. The adhesiveness, cohesiveness and chewiness of gelatin gel were higher than those of agar gel. Gelatin showed 100% water holding capacity while agar gel possessed relatively low water holding capacity (98.57%) which was likely due to the low concentration of agar for gel preparation compared to the gelatin gel. The stress relaxation time of agar gel was 2.54 s whereas that of gelatin gel was not measurable due to long time constraint. In conclusion, this study is useful in the development of agar-based gelatin substitutes which are preferred for low-calorie and vegetarian food products.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, the physicochemical properties of gelatin and agar gels with similar hardness were compared in order to determine the potential of agar-based gelatin substitute. Gel was prepared by adding 60 g sugar to 150 mL distilled water and subsequently gelatin or agar was added. Gelatin and agar concentrations used were 12 and 2 g/mL, respectively, for uniform hardness. Gelatin and agar gels showed no significant hardness values which were 22.36 and 22.80, respectively. The pH values of gelatin and agar gels formed were 8.17 and 7.05, respectively. Agar gel (14.13oBx) was slightly higher in sugar content than gelatin gel (12.97oBx). The brightness of gelatin gel surface was brighter than that of agar gel surface. The adhesiveness, cohesiveness and chewiness of gelatin gel were higher than those of agar gel. Gelatin showed 100% water holding capacity while agar gel possessed relatively low water holding capacity (98.57%) which was likely due to the low concentration of agar for gel preparation compared to the gelatin gel. The stress relaxation time of agar gel was 2.54 s whereas that of gelatin gel was not measurable due to long time constraint. In conclusion, this study is useful in the development of agar-based gelatin substitutes which are preferred for low-calorie and vegetarian food products.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, the physicochemical properties of gelatin and agar gels with similar hardness were compared in order to determine the potential of agar-based gelatin substitute. Gel was prepared by adding 60 g sugar to 150 mL distilled water and subsequently gelatin or agar was added. Gelatin and agar concentrations used were 12 and 2 g/mL, respectively, for uniform hardness. Gelatin and agar gels showed no significant hardness values which were 22.36 and 22.80, respectively. The pH values of gelatin and agar gels formed were 8.17 and 7.05, respectively. Agar gel (14.13oBx) was slightly higher in sugar content than gelatin gel (12.97oBx). The brightness of gelatin gel surface was brighter than that of agar gel surface. The adhesiveness, cohesiveness and chewiness of gelatin gel were higher than those of agar gel. Gelatin showed 100% water holding capacity while agar gel possessed relatively low water holding capacity (98.57%) which was likely due to the low concentration of agar for gel preparation compared to the gelatin gel. The stress relaxation time of agar gel was 2.54 s whereas that of gelatin gel was not measurable due to long time constraint. In conclusion, this study is useful in the development of agar-based gelatin substitutes which are preferred for low-calorie and vegetarian food products.

Key concepts: Gelatin, Agar, Distilled water, Chewiness, Agar gel, Chromatography, Sugar, Chemistry

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
경도가 동일한 한천 및 젤라틴 젤의 이화학적 특성 비교 — Research Paper | ScholarLens