2016Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksOpen access

Explaining Corruption: The Power to Label Organizations, Institutions and Individuals as Corrupt

Graham Brooks

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

For many of us the criminal justice system is seen as necessary for preventing crime; it is sometimes credited with reducing crime by deterrence, rehabilitation and incapacitation. Those embracing the theoretical approach of labelling are vigorously critical of this line of reasoning, and suggest that rather than prevent crime the criminal justice system is part of the problem by labelling people as criminals. This labelling helps anchor people in ‘criminal careers’ rather than restrain illegal conduct. The system of criminal justice and state intervention is considered to be dangerously criminogenic. Known as the ‘societal reaction’ to crime, it was made popular in the 1960s and early 1970s by Becker (1963), Erikson (1966) and Kitsuse (1964) and focusses on the social construction of crime, what is crime and how it is linked to societal reaction. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For many of us the criminal justice system is seen as necessary for preventing crime; it is sometimes credited with reducing crime by deterrence, rehabilitation and incapacitation. Those embracing the theoretical approach of labelling are vigorously critical of this line of reasoning, and suggest that rather than prevent crime the criminal justice system is part of the problem by labelling people as criminals. This labelling helps anchor people in ‘criminal careers’ rather than restrain illegal conduct. The system of criminal justice and state intervention is considered to be dangerously criminogenic. Known as the ‘societal reaction’ to crime, it was made popular in the 1960s and early 1970s by Becker (1963), Erikson (1966) and Kitsuse (1964) and focusses on the social construction of crime, what is crime and how it is linked to societal reaction. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For many of us the criminal justice system is seen as necessary for preventing crime; it is sometimes credited with reducing crime by deterrence, rehabilitation and incapacitation. Those embracing the theoretical approach of labelling are vigorously critical of this line of reasoning, and suggest that rather than prevent crime the criminal justice system is part of the problem by labelling people as criminals. This labelling helps anchor people in ‘criminal careers’ rather than restrain illegal conduct. The system of criminal justice and state intervention is considered to be dangerously criminogenic. Known as the ‘societal reaction’ to crime, it was made popular in the 1960s and early 1970s by Becker (1963), Erikson (1966) and Kitsuse (1964) and focusses on the social construction of crime, what is crime and how it is linked to societal reaction. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Criminal justice, Language change, Criminology, Deterrence (psychology), Labelling, Power (physics), Political science, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Explaining Corruption: The Power to Label Organizations, Institutions and Individuals as Corrupt — Research Paper | ScholarLens