2016•DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Open access

Net Neutrality| From Net Neutrality to Net Equality

John McMurria

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

I argue that the conceptual foundations for net neutrality assume a race neutrality that obfuscates the daily experiences of racial discrimination and the institutional dynamics of structural racism. I begin this study with an assessment of the race-neutral conceptual foundations of net neutrality reasoning, and then discuss how Critical Race Theory (CRT) has challenged these race-neutral frameworks. Drawing from CRT, I locate the ways in which legal and economic structures of discrimination have historically inhibited people of color from gaining access to employment, ownership, and decision-making power in the media and telecommunications sectors. I conclude with thoughts on how CRT can inform media policy scholarship to challenge race-neutral thinking and develop conceptual foundations for supporting what advocacy groups representing people of color have called “net equality.”

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I argue that the conceptual foundations for net neutrality assume a race neutrality that obfuscates the daily experiences of racial discrimination and the institutional dynamics of structural racism. I begin this study with an assessment of the race-neutral conceptual foundations of net neutrality reasoning, and then discuss how Critical Race Theory (CRT) has challenged these race-neutral frameworks. Drawing from CRT, I locate the ways in which legal and economic structures of discrimination have historically inhibited people of color from gaining access to employment, ownership, and decision-making power in the media and telecommunications sectors. I conclude with thoughts on how CRT can inform media policy scholarship to challenge race-neutral thinking and develop conceptual foundations for supporting what advocacy groups representing people of color have called “net equality.”

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I argue that the conceptual foundations for net neutrality assume a race neutrality that obfuscates the daily experiences of racial discrimination and the institutional dynamics of structural racism. I begin this study with an assessment of the race-neutral conceptual foundations of net neutrality reasoning, and then discuss how Critical Race Theory (CRT) has challenged these race-neutral frameworks. Drawing from CRT, I locate the ways in which legal and economic structures of discrimination have historically inhibited people of color from gaining access to employment, ownership, and decision-making power in the media and telecommunications sectors. I conclude with thoughts on how CRT can inform media policy scholarship to challenge race-neutral thinking and develop conceptual foundations for supporting what advocacy groups representing people of color have called “net equality.”

Key concepts: Net neutrality, Neutrality, Race (biology), Scholarship, Sociology, Racism, Critical race theory, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Net Neutrality| From Net Neutrality to Net Equality — Research Paper | ScholarLens