2009Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)Open access

Tectonic stress field in rift systems; a comparison of Rhinegraben, Baikal Rift and East African Rift

Alexander Barth, Damien Delvaux, Friedemann Wenzel

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Crustal stress pattern provide important information for the understanding of regional tectonics and for the modelling of seismic hazard. Especially for small rifts (e.g. Upper Rhine Graben) and beside larger rift structures (e.g. Baikal Rift, East African Rift System) only limited information on the stress orientations is available. We refine existing stress models by using new focal mechanisms combined with existing solutions to perform a formal stress inversion. We review the first-order stress pattern given by previous models for the Upper Rhine Graben, the Baikal Rift, and the East African Rift System. Due to the new focal mechanisms we resolve second-order features in areas of high data density. The resulting stress orientations show dominant extensional stress regimes along the Baikal and East African Rift but strike-slip regimes in the Upper Rhine Graben and the interior of the Amurian plate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Crustal stress pattern provide important information for the understanding of regional tectonics and for the modelling of seismic hazard. Especially for small rifts (e.g. Upper Rhine Graben) and beside larger rift structures (e.g. Baikal Rift, East African Rift System) only limited information on the stress orientations is available. We refine existing stress models by using new focal mechanisms combined with existing solutions to perform a formal stress inversion. We review the first-order stress pattern given by previous models for the Upper Rhine Graben, the Baikal Rift, and the East African Rift System. Due to the new focal mechanisms we resolve second-order features in areas of high data density. The resulting stress orientations show dominant extensional stress regimes along the Baikal and East African Rift but strike-slip regimes in the Upper Rhine Graben and the interior of the Amurian plate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Crustal stress pattern provide important information for the understanding of regional tectonics and for the modelling of seismic hazard. Especially for small rifts (e.g. Upper Rhine Graben) and beside larger rift structures (e.g. Baikal Rift, East African Rift System) only limited information on the stress orientations is available. We refine existing stress models by using new focal mechanisms combined with existing solutions to perform a formal stress inversion. We review the first-order stress pattern given by previous models for the Upper Rhine Graben, the Baikal Rift, and the East African Rift System. Due to the new focal mechanisms we resolve second-order features in areas of high data density. The resulting stress orientations show dominant extensional stress regimes along the Baikal and East African Rift but strike-slip regimes in the Upper Rhine Graben and the interior of the Amurian plate.

Key concepts: Rift, Geology, East African Rift, Graben, Half-graben, Seismology, Rift zone, Tectonics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tectonic stress field in rift systems; a comparison of Rhinegraben, Baikal Rift and East African Rift — Research Paper | ScholarLens