2020•Unpublished venueRequires access

Examining Opportunities to Learn Literacy: The Role of Critical Sociocultural Literacy Research

Elizabeth Birr Moje, Cynthia Lewis

Open publisher page 192 citations

Abstract

This chapter illustrates, through the analysis of one small bit of classroom transcript, that critical sociocultural perspectives may be the only available tools for demonstrating how children’s opportunities to learn are both supported and constrained by the role of power in everyday interactions of students and teachers and by the systems and structures that shape the institution of schooling. It begins with a theoretical discussion of some central constructs in work: learning, identity, agency, and power. Learning is motivated, as G. Kress argued, by a need to understand something, whether an act, a word, a sensory experience. Learning, however, also leaves a residue; it makes a mark on the participant. Power is a complicated and challenging construct, precisely because the working of power in people’s learning lives is often neglected or is relegated to a position of outside agent acting on the subject.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter illustrates, through the analysis of one small bit of classroom transcript, that critical sociocultural perspectives may be the only available tools for demonstrating how children’s opportunities to learn are both supported and constrained by the role of power in everyday interactions of students and teachers and by the systems and structures that shape the institution of schooling. It begins with a theoretical discussion of some central constructs in work: learning, identity, agency, and power. Learning is motivated, as G. Kress argued, by a need to understand something, whether an act, a word, a sensory experience. Learning, however, also leaves a residue; it makes a mark on the participant. Power is a complicated and challenging construct, precisely because the working of power in people’s learning lives is often neglected or is relegated to a position of outside agent acting on the subject.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 192 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter illustrates, through the analysis of one small bit of classroom transcript, that critical sociocultural perspectives may be the only available tools for demonstrating how children’s opportunities to learn are both supported and constrained by the role of power in everyday interactions of students and teachers and by the systems and structures that shape the institution of schooling. It begins with a theoretical discussion of some central constructs in work: learning, identity, agency, and power. Learning is motivated, as G. Kress argued, by a need to understand something, whether an act, a word, a sensory experience. Learning, however, also leaves a residue; it makes a mark on the participant. Power is a complicated and challenging construct, precisely because the working of power in people’s learning lives is often neglected or is relegated to a position of outside agent acting on the subject.

Key concepts: Sociocultural evolution, Literacy, Critical literacy, Psychology, Sociology, Pedagogy, Anthropology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Examining Opportunities to Learn Literacy: The Role of Critical Sociocultural Literacy Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens